Jack Phillips Will Not Back Down: ‘Worth It to Fight’: Christian baker has found himself, for the third time, at the center of a lawsuit filed by LGBT activists

National Review ^ | 03/28/2021 | BRITTANY BERNSTEIN

[UnChained]

If he put up a sign, that proceeds from the sale of each same-sex wedding cake will go to “The Alliance for Therapeutic Choice and Scientific Integrity” an organisation devoted to helping people overcome same sex attraction, I bet they would leave him alone

[StayoutdaBushesWay]

They probably would, but they would probably spit in it too (or god knows what else).

[DoodleDawg]

I smell a possible RICO case.

You would have to prove that those behind it are criminal organizations.

[daniel1212]

In 2018, Phillips partially won a case before the Supreme Court over his refusal to make a custom wedding cake for a same-sex couple. The high court ruled that the Colorado Civil Rights Commission showed anti-religious bias in sanctioning Phillips for his refusal to make the cake, though the justices did not rule on whether businesses can refuse services to gays or lesbians over religious objections.

And yet this was a clear case of wrongful prosecution, seeing as Phillips was not only refusing to be complicit in the celebration of out-of-state union that is contrary to the law of God, but at the time was also an illegal illicit marriage according to the highest law of the land, the CO constitution.

[daniel1212]

"Let’s see. Slavery was wrong and the nation fought a war to stop it. Same with taxation w/o representation. The nation has accepted that it’s not ok to be married but not allow gays the same. The womans vote took an amendment. All these issues involved human rights were hard fought. It brings me to my question-Just who’s getting screwed here? "

The moral man is, by SCOTUS, for comparing slavery with homosexual unions is a perverse comparison. Slavery in it's Biblical regulated form was sanctioned if not commanded in the vastly different context of the ANE and slave states, while the immorality of homosexual unions flows from the genesis of fundamental moral law, and is contrary to it in principal and precept, by design and decree.

For God made man and women distinctively different yet uniquely compatible and complementary, and only joined them together in marriage - as the Lord Jesus Himself specified (Mt. 19:4–6) - and Scripture only condemns homosexual relations wherever they are manifestly dealt with.

The problem is that SCOTUS (a liberal majority) made it illegal for states not to recognize this perversity, and thus they only basically touched upon the biased vengeance of CO vs. Phillips, rather than outright justify a man who refused to be complicit in the celebration of out-of-state union that is contrary to the law of God, and at the time was also an illegal illicit marriage according to the highest law of the land, the CO constitution.

Thus a liberal majority of SCOTUS made the bed and punished all who will not affirm it - to their own damnation. Yet there is still room at the cross for all who will come to God in repentance and faith, and trust in the Divine Son of God sent by the Father, the risen Lord Jesus, to save them on His account, by His sinless shed blood, and thus be baptized and live for Him. Acts 10:36-47

[I want the USA back]

They would never go to a muzzy bake shop and entrap them, knowing that their heads would be rolling down the street.

[Sonshinegirl]

Of course they did... maybe another way to donate?