Is that the same misguided, institutionally indoctrinated SCOTUS that wrongly (imo) decided not to examine PDJT’s evidence concerning alleged vote-counting fraud in the 2020 elections Texas v. Pennsylvania case?
Patriots are first reminded that the ongoing fight between the Constitution-ignoring desperate Democratic elite and constitutionally low-information despicable patriot majority voters is evidence of the following imo.
Democrats and RINOs have no intention of surrendering state powers that they have long been stealing from the states, along with stealing tsunami of state revenues uniquely associated with those powers, back to the states, state revenues stolen by means of unconstitutional federal taxes.
"Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States." —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
Patriots are also reminded that the states have never expressly constitutional given ordinary citizen voters the specific power to vote for POTUS like they have for both Houses of Congress.
More specifically, corrupt, desperate Democratic-bullied state governments have long since learned how to weaponize the politically correct popular vote for POTUS in their favor. This is evidenced by decades of activist states (all of them?) that blatantly ignore 12th Amendment (12A) electoral vote procedures, state so-called “winner take all” laws a blatant violation of that amendment imo.
Excerpted from the 12th Amendment: "The Electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice- President, and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate [emphasis added];--The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted; […]"
So why wasn’t the broad daylight stealing of votes with “winner take all” laws of activist states ever decided unconstitutional under 12A?
I dunno.
Insight welcome.