So this is really happening ...
Incidentally, the author is a lawyer.
So this is really happening ...
Incidentally, the author is a lawyer.
So if SCOTUS rules that the election was bad and that x number of votes have to be discarded, how is that going to change the minds of State legislators to appoint DJT electors? Wisconsin has already said it will not - Spineless GOP Assemblymen
This is a great, clear summary. Thanks for providing!
It would appear that way. Keep Praying...
“At this hour, we are being told that Louisiana, Arkansas, Alabama, Florida, Kentucky, Mississippi, South Carolina and South Dakota have all joined the suit that Paxton has filed.”
So we have 9 states (including Texas) which agree the election was run according to the Constitution.
“Needless to say, if the current election results in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin are overturned, the left will have a massive temper tantrum. Cities all over the nation would burn and we would see endless civil unrest for the foreseeable future.”
We’ll certainly see cities burn, but what is the alternative? The alternative is 9 states NOT recognizing the results of 2020 presidential election.
So, as bad as the likely ‘unrest’ in our cities will be, the alternative may be FAR WORSE (a splitting up of this country). Something for the Supremes to think about, if they’re considering punting here.
Notice how the lower state and Federal courts are dismissing these cases before any testimony or actual evidence is introduced and put on record. Either the judges are corrupt or lack courage.IMHO they are colluding with the globalists who stole the election and want the demented, frail, corrupt Biden as their pliable figurehead. Trials and testimonies will only enhance the illegitimacy of this Biden cabal in the eyes of the people. It will make it more difficult to ram their agenda. The future of the American nation lies in the hands of five justices. Do they have the courage to do the right thing?
Roberts anxiously awaits his next attache case of cash from Soros...
“ Well, it was put on the docket just 12 hours after it was filed, and so it will be heard.”
No, no, no, NO! That’s not how this works. Once again, every damn thing that comes to the Supreme Court gets “put on the docket”. And asking for a response is common. It does not mean anything.
If this guy is a lawyer, he should be embarrassed to put out something with such little research.
100% guarantee they will do nothing.
This communist coup is going to the people.
“In each of those states, those legislatures could opt to hold new elections or alternatively they could decide to choose new slates of electors themselves.”
I don’t believe that this I’d correct, at all.
Election Day was November 3. The Constitution provides remedies for a failure of ED voting to determine Electors. None of them are another election.
A second “Election Day” would be exactly like how the Democrats count “votes”. They would just iterate until they got the results they wanted. There would be the insanity already seen in the Georgia “runoff”, as the population of Georgia appears ready to temporarily swell with those who have already voted in other states.
That is why it is not a choice in the Constitution.
The Voters spoke on Election Day, but their voices were drowned out by the “humanitarian” Democrats. They also spoke when they elected their legislatures and other state officials. These are the only surviving remnants of their will, on or before November 3.
Let's pray that these Justices can find it within themselves to rise to the level of courage, wisdom, benevolence, and devotion to duty to which the American boys (most of them less than 21 years old) rose when they walked directly into machine gun fire on the beaches of Normandy in 1944.
The call to duty and wisdom is as great though the courage and devotion required are far less.
OUR LORD GOD, HISTORY, AND ALL THE WORLD ARE WATCHING YOU AND PRAYING THAT YOU WILL FIND THE COURAGE, WISDOM, BENEVOLENCE, AND DEVOTION TO DUTY NEEDED NOW AS NEVER BEFORE.
bump
Hoping and praying, but not holding my breath.
Should Trump fail in the courts he must uphold his oath to defend the Constitution and declare Marshal Law and arrest the traitors and hang them after convection.
Outcome-determinative case.
So many naysayers and chickenlittles. Get a spine!
When the shooting starts, get the f*** out of here.
The SCOTUS has original jurisdiction over suits between States. States would have no legal recourse to settle disputes if SCOTUS would decide not to hear a case. In short, I don’t think SCOTUS can decline to hear it as there is no lower court ruling to fall back on. Finally, an election fraud case that cannot be dodged. Perhaps I am wrong.
Is this the work of Ted Cruz?
btt
ping
Thank you for posting the entire thing. I went to the site to grab it for my friends. All the ads are so distracting.