Posted on 12/09/2020 5:33:44 AM PST by Zakeet
To refuse to hear a case from 10 states? Unlikely.
To refuse to hear a case from 10 states? Unlikely. They voted 6-3 to put it on the docket. It only requires 4 justices.
So many naysayers and chickenlittles. Get a spine!
When the shooting starts, get the f*** out of here.
Thanks. From what I understand — which is limited, since I’m not a legal scholar — they’re “friends of the court” and not plaintiffs. That helps strengthen the case, but it would be nice if they were also plaintiffs (if they can even do that).
It only takes 4 justices to put a case on the docket. My understanding is this was 6-3 to put it on the docket. They want to hear the case.
“The Harris v. Pennsylvania was on the docket and it got dismissed yesterday”
Actually that is untrue.....What was “not granted” was
EMERGENCY APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF INJUNCTION PENDING THE
FILING AND DISPOSITION OF A PETITION FOR A WRIT OF
CERTIORARI.
The case IS still pending.
Please, understanding the facts at this time is important for everyone. We must try and be accurate in what we post.
“...They voted 6-3 to put it on the docket ...”
Has that actually happened ?
Is there any link giving official confirmation?
The SCOTUS has original jurisdiction over suits between States. States would have no legal recourse to settle disputes if SCOTUS would decide not to hear a case. In short, I don’t think SCOTUS can decline to hear it as there is no lower court ruling to fall back on. Finally, an election fraud case that cannot be dodged. Perhaps I am wrong.
Is this the work of Ted Cruz?
Never mind !
Found the link !
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22o155.html
You don’t understand what put on the docket means. They didn’t vote on anything at all. Everything get put on the docket, even before it’s rejected.
My theory - I'm not a lawyer - is that they turned down Mike Kelly's case on Pennsylvania yesterday because they knew the facts and arguments would be brought out and encompassed by this case. That's my hope anyway.
Please see my #90. Literally everything get puts on the docket. Thousands of cases per year. And asking for a response is common. Doesn’t mean they will actually hear the case. And there has been no vote yet. The first vote will be after the response is in. Twitter rumors are borderline malicious at this point.
Thank you !
It is not complicated . Court accepts Texas proposed solution. Remands choice of electors back to the legislatures. Anyone here really believe 3 out of 4 of those legislatures are going to send a slate of electors who will vote for trump? I like you want it to happen.... but there is a reality here.
The is not necessity. That is already a power CODIFIED in the USC.
btt
I agree..... but we still don’t see those legislatures acting on it. Even when court tells them they can.... they won’t. That is the reality. This will require an armed event to stop a Biden presidency. Either martial law by trump or citizen revolution.
They can also invalidate the election due to the voter fraud evidence.
ping
Unfortunately I think you may be right.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.