Posted on 12/03/2020 8:51:22 AM PST by rxsid
Most people have no idea, and why would they? Geez, how well does it work when you throw people a ton of PPE with no training, which is usually how the military rolls. “Here it is, figure it out.” Google “Ebola Africa” if you want to see how people dress when they’re concerned about disease. They pretty much wear a full-body condom. Some mask made from a t-shirt is just as effective? Rrriiigghhhtt! This is as bad as the Israeli civilians running around in shorts, T-shirts, and gas masks when Saddam was popping off scud missiles at them and there were concerns of them being tipped with chemical weapons. (And actually, they had no worries. If Saddam had popped off chemical weapons at Israel, they would’ve removed Baghdad from the face of the earth.)
“Any doctor who tells you they have a 100% effective treatment for anything is lying to you.”
You are making a classic mistake with basic logic. The syllogism you are trying to create is called Ferio.
E = universal negative
I = particular affirmative
O = particular negative conclusion
It goes like this:
All doctors who claim 100% cure rate are not telling the truth
Dr. Thomas Borody claims a 100% cure rate for Covid-1984
Therefore, Dr. Thomas Borody is a liar.
The flaw here is in the first premise. The first premise is not honest of you. In layman’s terms it is what is called speaking in broad strokes, a hasty generalization.
Any reasonable person would say that the best you can say is that “Most doctors who claim 100% cure rate are not telling the truth”, which is a particular negative, not a universal negative. Now look at the syllogism:
Most doctors who claim 100% cure rate are not telling the truth
Dr. Thomas Borody claims a 100% cure rate for Covid-1984
Therefore, Dr. Thomas Borody is a liar.
Anyone can see this is not a valid syllogism.
If you took the time to listen to or research what this kind doctor has to say, you would have known that even he was surprised that his drug cocktail was 100% effective against the China virus. No, he doesn’t make any money by sharing this with us. It is a dirt cheap cocktail of ivermectin, zinc sulfate, and doxycycline. Note: This information will become more important later when Covid-23 is released, as this treatment is virus-agnostic. Any vaccine they make for Covid-1984 will only work on one strain of it, just like the flu, and there are many now in the wild. This information was completely suppressed by the lame stream media.
A good resource for the moral complications of these vaccines is Children of God for Life. Insofar as the DNA of aborted children are used in the manufacture of some of the vaccines.
Someone at church last night mentioned that one of the vaccines developed for Covid-1984 interferes with the production of a particular protein in the placenta. I don’t know which vendor and I don’t have a source for the info. But maybe a fellow FReeper can track it down. The implication is that a young girl or woman might not be able to bear children after taking the vaccine.
So the only 2 soon approved vaccines are using a tech that has never been approved and for a family of virus we have never vaccinated against.
By all means you can go in front of me. I might hold back a bit and risk my 99.6 99.9 survival rate.
I had cancer. Stage 3+ DLBCL (won’t go into gene expressions because it’s mostly edge cases). Normal protocols said chemo + radiation for max 5 year progression free survival. Radiation showed/demonstrated 5 yeaR PFS but if the radiation was in the main artery’s around the heart showed 10 year survival went down when no sign of disease occurred at least 2+ Rounds prior to end of chemo (age based but 10 years eithe heart attacks or major bypass). If center chest mass showed no active/measurable disease @ round 4 of 8 would you blindly agree to full chest radiotherapy? Even if both oncologist say you should.?
BTW no doctor discussed the 5-10 year impacts because the look mostly at 5 PFS as metrics.
Anyway - long story short - medical experts play the short term odds. The metric time frame odds. Not the patient time frame odds. Just the truth.
Vaccine you survive 👍
Vaccine your kids are never born or you have complications in the 3-5 years 👍
Feel free to humor me with specifics. If the good doctor is going to say things like that without even a one-liner as to why, the only thing he's doing is scare-mongering and spreading BS. Don't make us drag it out of you, doc, what is the problem with this vaccine.
Agreed. If there’s a problem, tell us what it is. “Going to your doom.” OK, at least give me a one-liner as to WHY.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.