Posted on 11/26/2020 11:35:22 PM PST by caww
Hmmm...Epoch Times...ONE reporter...conclusion? REAL news.
PFL
sNOW BIRDS VOTE IN 2 STATES.
>>Please add to this list<<
I’ve posted this before, but it would be nice if someone with access to the data would look at it again.
I watched Michigan’s results until 2am Central Time and went to bed because no results had been added for an hour or so. At that time, I was certain that Trump would win MI because of the following:
I looked at all the reports from blue counties in MI, as listend on the NYTimes website. I then treated every blue county as though ALL remaining votes would go to Biden. That is, if Wayne County was, say, 50% reported and the total vote was 100,000 at that time, it would imply a final total of 200,000 Wayne County votes, or another 100,000 left to come in. I gave them ALL to Biden. I did that for every county. After adding them all up, Trump was about tied, but there were dozens of Red counties with a lot of votes in each left to report.
Again, Trump would have been about tied with Biden assuming these two things, both in Biden’s favor:
1) All remaining blue county votes would be Biden votes, and
2) Trump would not get any more votes from Red counties, most of which had a lot of votes left to report.
If someone has the data by county at 2 am or so, and looks at what happened in the middle of the night, it could be revealing, because Biden apparently got a lot more votes by morning than were even outstanding at 2 am.
>>Crickets in main stream media.<<
The old “If a tree falls in the forest and no one hears it, did it make a sound” has turned into:
If a Democrat commits blatant fraud in plain sight, but the press doesn’t mention it, did it ever really happen?
Sadly, well over half the voters seem to think the answer is “No, it didn’t”.
>>“Should have a redo.”
All lawyers have said that’s not possible except for down-ballot races. The Constitution doesn’t have a provision for it with Presidential races. That’s when it goes to the legislatures / electors.<<
True, but if a state supreme court or the U.S Supreme Court were to rule that the evidence of extensive fraud was sufficient to call the election results into question, they could then void the election and suggest remedies, one of which would be to instruct the state legislature to disregard the election results and proceed on their own, as the Constitution provides.
Not a lawyer, but it seems to me like that’s how it could play out.
“instruct the state legislature to disregard the election results and proceed on their own, as the Constitution provides.”
Right. I think that’s what Guiliani and his team are aiming for.
We all new this would be fought but I really didn't think the Dems would be so open and obvious when Pa closed it's count and other states followed like domino's.... It was clearly apparent the ‘go’ button had been pushed for what we see now being presented in the courts.
.....”The requirement for reliable sources could be difficult because of the bias of the mainstream media”......
Specifically their censorship.
I agree...However I believe this also applies to Judges. I recently defended myself in a simple parking violation. Presented the facts clear and simple....even before I was finished the Judge saw this could not go forward. So did the officer.
Yes.
If a man says something and no woman hears it. Is he still wtong?
Couldn’t resist.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.