Just saw this at tdw:
Posted on 11/25/2020 9:12:08 PM PST by raynman33
Just saw this at tdw:
I see you're already back here attempting to post the same discredited talking points from yesterday. Trying to confuse the terms recount and audit, trying to ignore the fact that what is being recounted is not what the computer actually counted, while completely ignoring all the other discrepancies such as with mail in ballots, etc.
Based on your dogged determination to get this misinformation out, I'm even starting to wonder if you're actually part of the Rattburger/Sterling cabal. If not, maybe auditioning for a position.
IF we had an honest unbiased fbi Raffie would be under exquisite investigation right now and including trace of the accountsd of members of his family. He and Kemp should be in irons!
Look at the last line of the $10+M request. It requests that an un-official, private e-mail account be contacted for distribution of the funds, that supposedly belonged/belongs to a State employee, Gabriel Sterling.
Why would a private e-mail account be given out as the primary POC for the distribution of $10+M of government funds? Inquiring minds want to know, starting with Lin Wood.
Gateway pundit posted a video from Sterling:
“Starting at the 7:00 mark Sterling shares the following: Sterling talks about how the Secretary of State’s office “expanded the emergency rule to provide for drop boxes to go through the entire election cycle now.”
At the 8:00 mark Sterling talks about “working with the ACLU and the Chamber of Commerce” and has given more than 6,000 names to counties for the election.”
...
“Sterling admits the Secretary of State expanded the rules for voting and working with the activist group, the ACLU.”
Gateway pundit posted a video from Sterling:
“Starting at the 7:00 mark Sterling shares the following: Sterling talks about how the Secretary of State’s office “expanded the emergency rule to provide for drop boxes to go through the entire election cycle now.”
At the 8:00 mark Sterling talks about “working with the ACLU and the Chamber of Commerce” and has given more than 6,000 names to counties for the election.”
...
“Sterling admits the Secretary of State expanded the rules for voting and working with the activist group, the ACLU.”
So here is what I found:
States with excess voter registration compared to democrat vote increase from 2016 to 2020
Georgia:
Bryan County (118%) - red county 68% democrat increase
Forsyth County (114%) - red county 80% democrat increase
Dawson County (113%) - red county 72% democrat increase
Oconee County (111%) - 46% democrat increase
Fayette County (111%) - red county 59% democrat increase
Fulton County (109%) - 28% democrat increase
Cherokee County (109%) - red county 70% democrat increase
Jackson County (107%) - 70% democrat increase
Henry County (106%) - 46% democrat increase
Lee County (106%) - 44% democrat increase
Morgan County (105%) - 26% democrat increase
Clayton County (105%) - 22% democrat increase
DeKalb County (105%) - 23% democrat increase
Gwinnett County (104%) - 46% democrat increase
Greene County (104%) - 28% democrat increase (29% republican inc)
Cobb County (104%) - 39% democrat increase
Effingham County (103%) - red county 59% democrat increase
Walton County (102%) - 53% democrat increase
Rockdale County (102%) - 34% democrat increase
Barrow County (101%) - red county 59% democrat increase
Douglas County (101%) - red county 38% democrat increase
Newton County (100%) - 36% democrat increase
Hall County (100%) - red county 55% democrat increase
Sources
New Judicial Watch Study Finds 353 U.S. Counties in 29 States with Voter Registration Rates Exceeding 100% https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-releases/new-jw-study-voter-registration/?fbclid=IwAR0LRp9U8I5EkRTMWR-5yCQ1YFVEV_U3aJ2a8TOzXNd2YM7aqIqOYf4u8CM
—————
There seems to be (and it not easy for me to compare these percentages as I am on an iPad, someone should backcheck me) a correlation between excess voter registration and excess democrat votes when compared to 2016. This especially stands out in the deep red counties of Forsyth and Cherokee
Could someone in that area please run by 1801 Lawrence St in downtown Denver and see if Dominion has indeed closed their National office as some has claimed?
https://www.redfin.com/CO/Denver/1801-Lawrence-St-80202/home/34085787
The irony is that Stacey Abrams was probably deposed by seditious software users to install Kemp whom the chicoms could control.
Would be nice if some Denver-ire would drop by 1801 Lawrence downtown to see if it’s true that Dominion closed it’s National office there. Not a large building.
Kyle Becker
@kylenabecker
KRAKEN
“We’ve got pictures of the check stubs paid to people to ballot harvest.”
Uh oh. It looks like @SidneyPowell1 got the *RECEIPTS.
https://twitter.com/kylenabecker/status/1332428675392868358?s=20
—“ Here is another zinger. The signature rejection rate for absentee ballot applications was .00167% - only 30 statewide. Out of more than 1.3 absentee ballot applications only 30 signature rejections!!!!!!”—
By comparison, Colorado, widely regarded as having the best mail-in ballot security , rejects .86% (21,000+ per election cycle). The other two states that have been at it for awhile, Oregon and Washington, both reject more than 1%. So 30 in the whole state means they rejected the ones that said “Mickey Mouse,” or at least quite a few of them.
Exactly. Hand recounts were rendered impossible due to the Dominion system, the QR code’s contain the data,” hand” recounting those could take 6 months.
There is no “hand count” possible in Georgia. This is from a pre-election non-partisan article:
https://www.governing.com/security/Georgias-Electronic-Voting-System-Vulnerable-to-Attacks.html
To “hand count,” the counters would have to eyeball and interpret the “QR “ barcode” which takes a well-trained person a long long time to interpret. And there is no way to ascertain that it actually represents the voters intention. Trump victory or not, this is still a massive screw-up that needs to be fixed. Dominion and the other voting systems (and they pretty much ALL contain the same basic software architecture since they are spin-offs resulting from the anti-trust case against Diebold), are flimsy, a few bad actors can screw things up royally, even without coordination with any political party.
Ah, but the Donald Duck ballot went through just fine.<
I am still wonde4ring how a mail in ballot gets to the machines without ever being folded. As I understand it the blank ballot arrives in an envelope, folded, then is marked and refolded and inserted in an envelope for mailing, yet thousands of biden ballots were run through the counting machines that had never been folded. I wonder how that happens??? /sarcasm
Ugh, not a GA rep, an Alabama rep. Still good someone is speaking up.
GA reps are still MIA
https://www.governing.com/security/Georgias-Electronic-Voting-System-Vulnerable-to-Attacks.html
To “hand count,” the counters would have to eyeball and interpret the “QR “ barcode” which takes a well-trained person a long long time to interpret. And there is no way to ascertain that it actually represents the voters intention. Trump victory or not, this is still a massive screw-up that needs to be fixed. Dominion and the other voting systems (and they pretty much ALL contain the same basic software architecture since they are spin-offs resulting from the anti-trust case against Diebold), are flimsy, a few bad actors can screw things up royally, even without coordination with any political party.
No, not true. The printout also included a text summary of the selections on the machine. The voter is asked to verify these and validate on the voting machine before turning in the ballot to the scanner. I voted in Georgia and I had no problem looking at my ballot and determining that the printed selections matched my selections. There could be problems in the down ballot races that we may never now about. But the Presidential race was the race used in the hand count of 100% of these ballots and the counters ascertained the voter intent from the printed summary, not the QR code because like you said, who could possibly read QR codes.
The following is from the article you linked to:
Officials tell voters to verify their selections on a paper ballot before feeding it into an optical scanner. But the scanner doesn't record the text that voters see; rather, it reads an unencrypted quick response, or QR, barcode that is indecipherable to the human eye. Either by tampering with individual voting machines or by infiltrating the state's central elections server, hackers could systematically alter the barcodes to change votes.
Such a manipulation could not be detected without an audit after the election. Georgia plans to audit just one race on this year's ballot.
Raffenspurger decided the race that would be audited would be the presidential race and 100% of the scanned ballots would be included in the count. The ballots were not sent back through the scanners, rather they were determined by hand from the printed voter summary which candidate was selected and the totals tabulated by a different system then that used in the election.
All in all, pretty bulletproof as regards the Presidential race, and that is the one in question. Several folks are going to come behind this post and insist that the 100% hand count of the paper ballots did not happen. I really don't know the state of minds at this point.
Thanks for posting the article.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.