Posted on 11/20/2020 5:49:50 AM PST by BuckeyeGW
No. Not an exact match of the count. The simpler explanation is they manufactured those perfect ballots before the Dominion machine count.
One Georgia poll manager says voting machines arrived at her precinct unsealed, unlocked, serial numbers not matching the documentation and "the green b...
Before the Dominion count.
They kicked out the GOP observers at 10:30 and kept counting all night in Fulton county. The fact is that they could have done anything during that time.
See above
here is more than one account of counties being given a number that the recount had to match:
A screen shot is not evidence of anything
There are analysts who have found anomalies that were mathematically impossible, statistical DNA, where exact numbers were entered at the exact same time across several states.
Not evidence of any software bias. The simpler explanation is large dumps of manufactured Biden ballots fed into the counting machines.
The idea the recount is any kind of evidence against the claims about Dominion is pretty naive.
No, it's not naive. It's two things: that fraudulent ballots were created and counted. Second, it's that algorithm bias is easy to verify and easy to disprove. Ultimately it will be used to discredit the case for massive fraud (which there was).
The last sentence is my opinion. Everything else I typed above is fact or questions about the "evidence" of machine bias. I've seen rodeos like this before.
In my opinion she has been played. It will be easy to disprove machine bias. Just hand count and compare to the machine count. It would be an easy way to discredit her.
I could end up being wrong. But it's too easy to disprove machine bias or server in Germany or any other theory while distracting from the massive fraud by fraudulent ballots / harvesting /dead voters etc.
They could have done it either way. It didn’t necessarily have to be before, it could have been in the middle of the night election night and in the days following.
Before the Dominion count.
No, after. During the recount.
A screen shot is not evidence of anything
The person who made the allegations in the screen shot, has sworn an affidavit and is be part of the lawsuits filed in GA
The last sentence is my opinion. Everything else I typed above is fact or questions about the "evidence" of machine bias. I've seen rodeos like this before.
Well, I believe both are happening and one does not discredit the other. The Trump team is bringing both to bear in court. Giuliani says they have enough fraudulent votes alone (minus dominion) to overturn the election.
Isn’t what you stated exactly what happened in Georgia?
I think the signatures on the ballots is about all they have and if I understand things correctly, I think there are quality assurance issues to link the votes with the mail in signed portions.
I’m not the brightest bulb in the Christmas lights but I’m sure I heard Sidney explain clearly to the media idiots group that the lawyers were giving them an “outline” of some of the issues that will be used in the law suit coming up, and the reason is obvious. The media would taint their case before it came up in the court. Stupid expectation by Tucker. You don’t get the game plan before the game.
By the way, you didn’t address the fact that Dominion reps were actually involved in the process in GA, and in MI (I believe) according to the witness there, who has also has a sworn affidavit of her testimony. These were not some low level Dominion IT guys, they were executives of the company. Eric Coomer is the Director of Dominion Security, patent holder and shareholder, helping to “count” the ballots in a small county in GA during the recount.
Why do you think that is?
Why did they move their offices in the middle of the night? Why have workers there scrubbed their associations with Dominion from the internet? Why hasn’t Dominion she’d Powell? Why did the bow out of the PA hearing today? Why was Malloch appearing in Lin Wood’s TRO hearing yesterday?
Dominion is neck deep in this, whether the fake ballots were injected before, after or in between.
GO, Sydney!
I have deleted it from my TV!
Exactly!
Don’t accept the mark of the beast when it is commanded to you. You are a supporter of lies, you know it, so be warned that after the Redeemed whose spirits are alive with the seed of God abiding therein are departed to The Father’s House, you children of the liar better reject the mark when commanded to you by your antichrist.
“I could end up being wrong.”
You got that part right.
It's a lot more work to gather up 1000 affidavits for 10's of thousands of fraudulent votes, but it is going to nake a more solid case.
Does that mean they altered the SW to bias the count? No. But here's what they could have done: misconfigured the scanner so it assigns the filled ovals to the wrong candidate. That's easy to do as we saw in another MI county. Or an election official could have done that (and in fact did accidentally do that in another county).
But none of those possibilities are undetectable. Just rerun the same ballots through a properly configured scanner/counter.
Dominion is neck deep in this, whether the fake ballots were injected before, after or in between.
They are counters. Sure they could help out creating fraudulent ballots. So what. In the end either they counted the fraudulent (and a few non-fraudulent) ballots correctly or they did not.
If they counted them incorrectly that's very easy to detect. Just hand count. Sure that count could be screwed up too. But the fact remains that SW shenanigans are easy to detect and easy to disprove if there are none.
Well he has at least 800 already
‘B-b-bu-ut muh kids private school is expensive!!’ - TC
IOW, these lists (records) are there - somewhere. That is what I observed here in NH as a poll challenger. An audit would use the lists to investigate and verify all votes cast legally. The rest must be "rejected" (disqualified) ballots.
As a side note, I will throw out there to the Democrats that they can't hide behind 'Covid' and allow rampant fraud.
Sure - many in 2020 were 'afraid' to vote in person, but a significant change in people's voting habits (i.e. to the use of Absentee Ballots and vote by mail) doesn't mean we should breeze through without checking.
If anything, it means we should slow down and give the outcome a review. Right Dems?
As usual, the Dems' insistence we hurry-hurry and install Biden (no review or audit needed) just shows they like to run their mouths and bully/bluster/smarmy their way into "victories" that millions of Americans know is corrupt railroading.
I think the above is the Trump team's strongest argument for taking our time to do a careful audit of a few sample / questionable precincts. As Steve Bannon likes to regularly say, "What's your rush, Dems?....."
Yes, it only requires careful and multi-party recounting of a few precincts. Maybe about 10,000 ballots total. That could easily verify some of the machine algorithm bias claims.
Here in Virginia the recount rules require complete recounting and complete agreement among multiple counters. Without counting by multiple parties the counting is worthless because the other party observers can't catch the mistakes, especially at a distance.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.