Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pa. Supreme Court rejects Trump campaign claim that Republicans lacked access to Philly vote count
Philly Inquirer ^

Posted on 11/17/2020 2:07:18 PM PST by TigerClaws

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: TigerClaws

Who are these people? Were they paid or some other benefit? Looking more and more like the corruption at highest levels.


41 posted on 11/17/2020 3:40:53 PM PST by Pajamajan ( PRAY FOR OUR NATION. I will never be a peaceful slave to a Socialist new America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

I would love to see an audit of all of the PA politicians to determine the actual corrupt-o-crat score!


42 posted on 11/17/2020 3:44:05 PM PST by Shady (It is the rule of law vs tyranny, plain and simple, and it is the fight of our lives...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws; null and void; aragorn; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; bitt; Black Agnes; blueyon; ...

.

PING

Check out article and # 17, # 10.

Thanks, TigerClaws.

43 posted on 11/17/2020 3:52:02 PM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: LucyT

Same court as what got smackdown by the USSC, right?


44 posted on 11/17/2020 4:06:17 PM PST by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: tarpit

If that was the case then it would have been 7-0. The reason they dissented because they believed the commonwealth court's decision should not have been vacated because observers were impaired.

From the Chief Justice...

The Commonwealth Court reasonably directed election officials in Philadelphia to move restrictive barriers in the Convention Center closer to the ballot-canvassing operations, which had been staged up to thirty-five yards from the areas to which the statutorily-authorized candidate representatives were confined. Under the Commonwealth Court’s order, these representatives could then observe whether ballots were being counted lawfully to the best of their ability, consistent with health and safety restrictions. The record --as well as publicly-available video recordings from the Convention Center --amply demonstrate that this simply wasn’t the case previously.

Mundy's opinion in full, it's short

Based on the particular circumstances surrounding this election, and the volume of mail-in ballots cast due to the current global pandemic, I disagree with the majority that the “issue before us isone which is capable of repetition but likely to evade review[.]” Majority Op. at 10, n. 7. As such, I join Chief Justice Saylor’s dissenting opinion in full.

In denying Appellee’s initial motion, the trial court concluded “[Appellee]’s argument that the Board of Elections was not providing observers the opportunity to ‘meaningfully observe’ the canvassing of ballots” failed because “[Appellee] was unable to point to any statutory language or case law using the word ‘meaningful’ or elaborating on what constitutes ‘meaningful observation.’” Trial Court Op. at 3. The Commonwealth Court reversed noting “the relegation of those representatives to a position where [J-116-2020] [MO: Todd, J.] -2meaningful observation of the processes they are present to observe is a practical impossibility would be an absurd interpretation of the Election Code[.]” Cmwlth Ct. Op. at 6. I agree.The majority now vacates the Commonwealth Court’s order and holds “[w]hile this language contemplates an opportunity to broadly observe the mechanics of the canvassing process, we note that these provisions do not set a minimum distancebetween authorized representatives and canvassing activities occurring while they ‘remain in the room.’” Majority Op. at 17. In so doing, the majority seemingly endorses what the Commonwealth Court did in its order, provide an “opportunity to broadly observe[.]

Appellee was merely requesting the ability to be able to observe the ballots in order to accurately relay compliance information. Appellees’Brief at 22 (“The Campaign simply wants the right to observe in a meaningful way that would allow the Campaign to determine whether the Board was following legal processing procedures, and if not, to challenge that process through appropriate litigation.”). The Commonwealth Court’s order, and the subsequent mutual agreement of the parties in the Federal action, did precisely that, and I would not disturb it. Accordingly, I dissent.

45 posted on 11/17/2020 4:22:48 PM PST by rollo tomasi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

a bunch of “black-robed terrorists” who happen to be all democrats.


46 posted on 11/17/2020 4:23:38 PM PST by euram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

The Republican Legislature needs to start taking a few scalps from the PASC. These people don’t deserve the positions to which they were elected. Impeach.


47 posted on 11/17/2020 4:50:11 PM PST by Tallguy (Facts be d@mned! The narrative must be protected at all costs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Natch...


48 posted on 11/17/2020 5:29:12 PM PST by Carriage Hill (A society grows great when old men plant trees, in whose shade they know they will never sit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

SPJNK.


49 posted on 11/17/2020 5:29:40 PM PST by Carriage Hill (A society grows great when old men plant trees, in whose shade they know they will never sit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

The PA liberal judges wouldn’t find any other way. But does a loss in State court mean you can appeal to the SCOTUS?


50 posted on 11/17/2020 5:33:11 PM PST by jch10 (S's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Paving the way for a higher court. My only fear is that Roberts may have got to one of the new hires in the court since there is so much pressure on him to vote against Trump no matter how compelling the evidence Powell presents.


51 posted on 11/17/2020 5:57:02 PM PST by rodguy911 ((FreeRepublic home of the free because of the Brave---Where we go One))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Logic dictates everything you said is correct.What worries me is who or how many have been compromised on the court besides Roberts.


52 posted on 11/17/2020 6:00:48 PM PST by rodguy911 ((FreeRepublic home of the free because of the Brave---Where we go One))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Dont mess with Sidney,she will right the wrongs of the left!!


53 posted on 11/17/2020 6:05:44 PM PST by rodguy911 ((FreeRepublic home of the free because of the Brave---Where we go One))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

Been that way even before the “Remember the Pay Raise” fiasco. Seems they rubber stamp anything the elites, deep state, and leftists support..... corrupt or not.


54 posted on 11/17/2020 6:13:56 PM PST by apoliticalone (SOCIAL JUSTICE is as much about justice as PATRIOT ACT is about patriotism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dave Wright

And where were the GOP lawyers reviewing PA election rules and guidelines for observers to ensure that it said “ Observers will be allowed to have meaningful access, not having to observe 6 ft social distancing rule, to do their job.”?

Again, we didn’t prepare and plan for their COVID enforcement of rules in this election.


55 posted on 11/18/2020 5:55:14 AM PST by Engedi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson