Tucker Carlson Says There's Not Enough Fraud to Change Election Results: 'We Should Be Honest'

Newsweek ^ | 11-10-20 | JACOB JARVIS

[FormerFRLurker]

I always thought Tucker was in Trump’s camp. This is double plus ungood news.

[Homeschoolmom]

This headline is not accurate. You really should watch the show from last night. He was very vocal about voter fraud.

[Liz]

“Uncertainty” is a subjective individual standard. It is just as likely the majority could say “it does”, as “does not.”

Thx for proving the point......having some say “it does”, others say it “does not”......is a plusperfect definition of uncertainty.

[Wm F Buckley Republican]

Thank you! TUCKER IS RIGHT! He said that right now we lack proof. That is a long way from saying the proof is not there. It is a very bad thing to jump to conclusions. Tucker is the voice we need right now.

[nitrojiber]

Good lord people, read the article. Tucker said "At this stage, the fraud that we can confirm does not seem to be enough to alter the election result. We should be honest and tell you that. Of course, that could change"

[Wm F Buckley Republican]

TUCKER IS. RIGHT! Freepers are the perfect example of mob mentality, just like the left.

[John W]

Watched it live. He’s being honest as he called for ALL to be.

[Homeschoolmom]

“Good lord people, read the article. Tucker said “At this stage, the fraud that we can confirm does not seem to be enough to alter the election result. We should be honest and tell you that. Of course, that could change””

Honestly, we should be better than this. Reading a false headline and then reacting without any confirmation of its veracity makes us conservatives look gullible.

[oldtech]

How much evidence of fraud is needed to be shown before something is done? I’d think one provable incidence might be enough to start some action.

[Wm F Buckley Republican]

And Freepers should stop jumping to conclusions.

[windsorknot]

I listened to the entire show and heard exactly what he said. He wasn’t kind to the Bolsheviks. I’m not going to abandon Tucker.

[lodi90]

I watched the whole Tucker show last night. From what I saw a few days ago Hannity has actually been harder on Fox than Tucker. He’s pulling his punches and it’s quite obvious.

[lodi90]

Tucker has hardly any advertisers left. First ad last night was after 24 minutes. Fox could probably run infomercials and make more money than running his show at this point due to advertiser boycotts.

[McGruff]

Your first mistake is reading anything from Newsweak.

[rlmorel]

Yes...I think we all need to be more discriminating in what we see coming out of the media, no doubt.

Myself included.

[McGruff]

Where’s the video of this?

[voicereason]

Tucker is about Tucker...just like Hannity. He’s actually a bit of a jerk and saw this first-hand back when he was on in the weekend mornings.

[Wm F Buckley Republican]

Thank you for a voice of reason. Tucker is our friend!

[MountainWalker]

Ok we’re cutting off allies on hostile networks now? Fine. How long should Tucker and Hannity get blackballed? Have you cancelled cable yet? That’s mostly how faux is getting paid, not pillow sales.

[mmanager]

“ NO - Tucker is not being required by the higher ups to say anything. He’s being responsible. We hate when CNN and MSNBC lies... it would be wrong for Tucker to make any conclusion as with whether or not the results will hold or not.”

Bingo! I watched him live last night and that’s exactly how I took it. Every needs to understand how high the bar is in convincing the highest court in the land to invalidate 100’s of thousands ballets. This isn’t a slam dunk by no means.