We need a forensic investigation of the code to see why these “glitches” are happening.
I’d be ecstatic if there was a computer error in WI that caused a 19,000+ switch in votes that, when corrected, would cut Trump’s deficit to only 1,500 votes. However, what Hot Air is claiming is that the final numbers in Rock County, WI were inverted, so that the true results were that Trump beat Biden in the county by 54.66% to 43.51% instead of Biden beating Trump by such amount. Trump got only 41.40% in Rock County in 2016, and the last time that a Republican presidential candidate carried that county was in the second Reagan landslide (1984). Yes, we have seen Trump win counties that we hadn’t won since Reagan, but usually Trump also had done really well there in 2016, not lose by over 10%. And Rock County is not dominated by a demographic group that swung wildly towards Trump between 2016 and 2020, such as Mexican-Americans in the Rio Grande Valley or Miami-Dade Latinos.
So the likeliest explanation for the discrepancy is that the original reported result of Trump winning the county by 9,500 votes was wrong because someone had input (or the computer assigned) the Biden number for Trump and vice versa, and that when the numbers were flipped later on it was a correction of the prior error. I hope that I’m wrong about this, but I doubt it. And while President Trump definitely should request a recanvassing and/or recount in Wisconsin, the margin that he needs to make up will be 20,000, not 1,500.
In the real world of engineering, a “glitch” is a transient condition that is almost always the result of a poor design which doesn’t account for all possibilities that can occur with input conditions.
In that sense, this is not a glitch.
The real question is whether these anomalies seen in the data are the result of innocent human error or deliberate malicious tampering.
It’s possible that the fraudsters intentionally created these “glitches” as bait for investigators. They were meant to be found, to distract attention from much more significant data tampering.
They will tell you that an entry error which gave votes to one candidate that should have gone to the other was the “innocent human error”, and a later correction was made which reassigned the votes to the proper candidate thereby creating the “glitch” which is seen as one candidate gaining the exact number of votes that the other one lost.
This is “plausible deniability”.
This would give Trump the lead. Biden is leading right now, and has for several days by 20,500 votes. If you move 19,000 votes from Biden to Trump, Trump will take the lead by 18,500 votes. Gateway Pundit is far too often click bait... NO ONE else has this, and if its true, it may already be baked into the number.
In short, if absolutely no one voted in the 2020 election, Harris would still have won by the exact same numbers. As of right now, no one not the FBI or the DOJ is interested in pursuing this damming evidence.