Posted on 10/28/2020 10:54:12 PM PDT by conservative98
There are new details about the son and brothers attempts to cut deals in China based on their family brand, but the key allegation is that Joe Biden himself was pulled into his sons Chinese negotiations.
So do your job and start covering it!!!!!
Now ya’ll question the veracity of the story? gtho
Have a potential US President partner with communist China and with Russia in their energy companies while promising to destroy American energy companies isnt interesting?
Compare the evidence in this to the evidence, none at all, in the russian collusion delusion against Trump and get back to me.
The senate should already have acted and a special investigator should have been appointed yesterday.
“Assuming it wasn’t as bad as is being reported, we conclude that it isn’t as bad as is being reported.”
Really ?
The media has no ‘Hunter Biden conundrum’, it is ALL lockstep Pravda.
And all involved are pleased with their evil.
They ridiculously downplay everything.
The Bidens got Billions.
My word as a Biden.
Great insight, Bookman.
I completely missed that.
Diamonds, Furs, Billions - selling our National Security - and they say, his sons sketchy salesmanship.
This is like calling Jeffrey Dahmer not always the best host.
This article is for those totally ignorant of any of the facts, and clueless in life.
“but it seems like evidence that he wasnt particularly worried about keeping his sons sketchy salesmanship at arms length.”
Yeah lol, that’s what it probably is. Go back to sleep...
Re: if the NYT would do their effing job, the right wing media would not exist.
Great point, jockey.
Thanks for posting.
Have a potential US President partner with communist China and with Russia in their energy companies while promising to destroy American energy companies isnt interesting?
Youd almost think that might be newsworthy.
B-b-b-b-but, I *SWEAR* I didn't do that, Biden's Honor!
So ... the NYT doesn’t feel comfortable covering the details of the scandal, but they will dip their toes in the water by covering the conversation about “should they cover the details.” Right. Now they can say they didn’t ignore the issue.
bookmark
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.