Re-evaluate yourself.
You ain't all that.
Posted on 08/20/2020 6:45:27 AM PDT by mn-bush-man
When I post a sentence in quotation marks, and then comment, it is understood, in American writing, and on this site, that the quoted remark and the response are directly connected.
Re-evaluate yourself.
You ain't all that.
“Then why did it look like you were talking about Trump?”
Again, when I highlight a statement in quotation marks, and then respond directly to the statement in quotation marks, it is clear as daylight who I am referring to, as in this very quoted remark of yours.
And, all my many posts on this site, from very early on, very early on, have been in support of Trump.
Now, as an example, I don’t read all your posts, but I do know that you are a vocal Q supporter, and I would never assume you said anything to disparage Q.
“You ain’t all that.”
By the way, what the hell does that mean? In other word, you think you are.
It appears that you do, and on this we are in agreement.
See? We found common ground.
And this is why you're confusing to read.
You first say you don't know what 'that' means, and you follow right up with a question that indicates that you do.
Very confusing to the reader.
You would assume wrong, depending on your definition of 'disparage'.
I have questioned some Q writings, I have even questioned the Trump when I think he's made a mistake.
Like [Trust Wray] for instance.
Q posted that early on when Wray was first appointed. I took that to mean that [Wray] was not a derp.
Later events proved that he was and Q then wrote that [Wray] (amongst others] was a 'sleeper'.
My interpretation of that was that Trump (and the Q team) did not realize [Wray] was a derp, that he was not known to be one. After he exposed himself, they ackowoledged it.
I chalked that up to both Q and Trump having made a mistake in judgement.
Now, is that 'disparaging' Q?
Or is that honest observation?
None of us are mindless sheep 'following' Q in a cult-like mannah. Nor do we all follow along in lock step agreement.
We are encouraged to think for ourselves, and we do.
“You first say you don’t know what ‘that’ means, and you follow right up with a question that indicates that you do.”
It may be confusing to you, but not to most people. It is a rhetorical question referring to the snark you applied to me. In other words, to make it plain to you, that kind of generalized snark is understood by everyone, but its application to me certainly is not warranted.
Now the fact that you highlight all your posts with a large icon to draw attention to yourself means that you think you are somebody, the exact opposite of “you ain’t all that”. Or, you are of a diminutive stature and you always have had trouble with people noticing you.
Or, option C. I'm awesome.
I'll go with option C.
And 'snark' isn't in my vocabulary. Another internet inspired word that the elderly overuse to seem hip.
One man's 'snark' is another man's inspired rhetoric.
And, since I don't dislike you and you seem a likely lad, I have some words of advice.
It would behoove you to read all my posts. In that way, you may learn something and find yourself a better man.
I'm a helper.
A condescending schmuck addresses himself.
A sphincter says what?
how’s this? yer stupid.
You’ve been a real annoyance lately. Why not take that stuff over to Duhmmie Underground where you came from.
You need to explore what about me annoys you.
Because its not me, its you.
#KnowThyself
“And ‘snark’ isn’t in my vocabulary.”
I can certainly believe that due to your obviously limited vocabulary.
For an internet insult to be effective, the insult should have some basis in reality.
I help you because I see potential in you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.