Barr’s Prosecutor Hasn’t Grilled Key Russiagate Witnesses

The Daily Beast via Yahoo ^ | May 14th, 2020 | Spencer Ackerman

[mass55th]

"Durham...still hasn’t interviewed at least five key potential witnesses or targets..."

Have you ever stopped to think that he might be gathering evidence, and statements from the various people down the chain, so that he has pertinent facts that he can ask the higher-ups involved in the fraud when the time comes...see if you can catch them in lies.

[gogeo]

My thought also.

[Lurkinanloomin]

I sure hope we’re not all waiting for the Great Pumpkin.

[kallisti]

That, and it’s from the Beast.

[TBP]

I hope he’s getting to them.

[TalBlack]

Bottom line: We don’t know what time line Durham is working on-Is it whenever, pre November, post Novemember. I’d bet though that he could convince witnesses to absolutely keep their mouths shut or suffer the consequences. Many times a prosecutor has other fish to fry and may let leaks slide. Durham may have assured them that he’ll go after them.

[elpadre]

“....multiple sources familiar with the issue told The Daily Beast....”

isn’t that the Democratic, progressive, liberal, leftie line???

[Jack Black]

I'm reluctant to read too much into this. We know that he has empanelled several Grand Juries, and has other people working for him.

Still, interesting to speculate on this information.

[DarthVader]

+100!!

[timestax]

Still not interviewed by Durham are former CIA Director John Brennan, former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe. Nor have been former FBI agent Peter Strzok, former FBI attorney Lisa Page, both of whom were involved in the FBI’s “Crossfire Hurricane” inquiry and whose texts disparaging Trump have for years been presented by the president as proof he was framed. Nor has former National Security Adviser Susan Rice, who, despite not being an intelligence or law enforcement official, has been another Trumpist target.

WELL, what's the holdup??OH, a big fraternity party!!

[rolling_stone]

anybody think they won’t take the 5th?

[timestax]

Don't hold your breath !

upload image to webside

[timestax]

That's right Jack. Come on mad, er Dan, erThat thing, man.Man on man, right arm, er right on!

[Bommer]

So if I understand this, it took 2 years to go after who exactly? If He hasnt interviewed the main players in all of this, then who is he trying to get? This is a cover up. Nothing will happen, bank on it! Thanks Cheeseburge Barr!

[itsahoot]

Right, you work your way up the ladder.

Do they do all that before or after Trump leaves office?

[romanesq]

Full speed ahead. It’s Bull Durham time!

[whistleduck]

Exactly. Sessions, is/was the great Pumpkin. And the whole host of others that have done nothing but collect gobermet cash. Huber was a no show.
I have no faith in Durham just based on the actions of others.

[Lurker]

See my tag line.

L

[itsahoot]

Bottom line: We don’t know what time line Durham is working on-Is it whenever,

He only has to make you believe he is getting ready to drop the hammer, he doesn't actually have to drop it, especially if they just stall around until the dems steal the next election.

[WASCWatch]

They all likely refused to be interviewed. Don’t blame them for that decision. I’d do the same thing. It would be improper to announce they refused to be interviewed.

There is still plenty of evidence to indict them with or without an interview.