Did Schumer watch this episode of TOS for inspiration?
Posted on 01/16/2020 4:37:02 AM PST by Eleutheria5
Yawn. More gum flapping from Graham. The proof will be in the pudding next week.
Linda said she is really really really going after Kerry and Biden this time. YAWN.
I’d prefer that he at least talk the talk. Heaven help us if he goes all mealy-mouthed.
By asking for further investigation the rats are admitting they went ahead and impeached the President with no evidence or crime. They should be brought up on fraud charges.
Did Schumer watch this episode of TOS for inspiration?
‘
Graham supports Witnesses for the Dems, and says he’ll prohibit Trump from getting any Witnesses.
He won’t say No to the other side, won’t support changing rules to wield power, and is hamstringing Trump.
If the Dems get Witnesses, and if you weren’t born yesterday, you know they will, nothing will be fast. The Fast thing is being falsely sold to prohibit Trump Witnesses.
When they say we can’t do X, it means they won’t.
The House changed their rules to make this happen.
Most importantly, the other side knows Graham will work to get them whatever they want.
Just like his support of Comey and Mueller earlier.
‘
.
McConnell will bully Trump into not asking for any of the key witnesses. He’ll just hide behind Romney and the girls and say he doesn’t have the votes for them. Of that I have no doubt. Maybe he will allow Giuliani to testify but he will be dismissed as a partisan and/or arrested by SDNY and perp walked during the Senate trial.
Schumer insisted that lying under oath in front of a federal judge did not “rise to the level of impeachment”. But “obstructing Congress” somehow does.
‘
No doubt SDNY is out to get Guiliani.
Guiliani is talking about Biden’s Ukraine Crimes, they can’t have that.
The Senate is lying offering a fast trial, when that really isn’t fast, and it gives the Dems every shot they want at Trump.
Fast is not Fast. It means that we will prevent any counter-attack by Trump, shaving those few days, while they are powerless (by choice) to the Dems dragging things out.
Graham has to lie, or he won’t get re-elected in SC.
His first allegiance is to see things are “fair” in the minds of the Senate Dems. That’s how he operates.
.
Agreed.
More witnesses = NO case...
Is it awful that I not only knew his name, but the episode title, instantly?
:D
Yep; just ask yourself if you would ever want to share a foxhole with Graham.
“Graham supports Witnesses for the Dems, and says he’ll prohibit Trump from getting any Witnesses.”
As much as he irritates me, can we stop with the copy and pasting together of two separate stories from weeks apart that are not an actual position of his today?
No, Graham DOES NOT advocate this.
“Graham supports Witnesses for the Dems, and says he’ll prohibit Trump from getting any Witnesses.”
Oh bullshit!! You believe everything you read? Who the HELL cites as fact anything from Gateway Pundit?
YOU are a total mistake to be posting here...every post scares me to death for folks such as you...
Get over yourself...and get lost..go play at DNC sites...
YOU are one reason FR is not as popular as it once was...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.