Is Tucker saying that the person who was killed was NOT Soleimani?
Is he saying that all those attacks against America including the one against our embassy were not masterminded by Soleimani?
We were told all of these by our intelligence agencies.
> “He was the guy, remember, who allegedly helped persuade the president not to hit back at Iran last summer after they downed a U.S. drone.”
Utter BS.
POTUS explained very well himself why he declined to retaliate against the Iranian Regime for last year’s drone attack. Carlson had zero to do with the decision.
Tucker makes a good argument EXCEPT he forgets about the threat of a nuclear Iran. If we do what he says and stay out of the middle-east Iran will eventually become a global threat and it will be much harder to deal with them.
How did the President get the Iranians to attack the US Embassy in Baghdad?
The US performed a flawless direct proportional response to the people who planned, and organized, that internationally recognized act of war. A target which has direct documented links to the assassination of 700 US troops in Iraq and Afghanistan
That you infantile scum are trying to play politics with this is yet another indication of your total unfitness to hold any political office, at any level, anywher
Tucker is a Liberaltarian, he would gladly vote for Karl Marx if he was promised a big sack of dope to smoke with his queer boyfriend.
I trust what I have known for decades about Iran, and also that this is most likely military intel, not CIA.
I think the deep state uses these Iranian events as a cover to try to assassinate the President.
The deep state was originally the nickname given to people like Comey, Brennan, and a few others trying to bring down the President using Russia and then the Ukraine. The way Tucker is using it, it now means the entire U.S. federal bureaucracy. That is not fair. Not everyone in DC is a political hack involved in some Byzantine scheme to bring down the President. Most of them are just doing their jobs.
A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds
Ralph Waldo Emerson
Rational sane adults think, they do not cling to a foolish ignorance because that ignorance happens to fits their emotion based political dogmas
Ultimate question here: Who leaked it?
Rarely will we see a clearer picture of what I described last week as the basic divide within MAGA-era populism.
Some, like Tucker, are principled paleocon skeptics about military action; the vast majority are “In Trump We Trust” Republicans who are willing to see war, and the intelligence bureaucracy, as more or less virtuous as Trump’s political needs require.
No clearer indicator of a second rate intellect than the deployment of the straw man. The result of ignorance, or necessity? Who knows.
The Intel apparatus? I've passed skepticism and arrived at cynicism. I don't believe them. No one can can seriously argue PT does. If PT chose to act his knowledge cleared a high barrier.
If the Intel hive makes a "mistake," I assume malice. If PT makes a mistake I assume his intentions were good.
I don't believe PT is perfect. I'm willing to live with his mistakes.
It’s simple Tucker!!!!!!!
SUPPORT OUR PRESIDENT!!!!!
AND STOP UNDERMINING HIM!!!!!
I watched Tucker Monday night. He sounded like one of those bleeding-heart doves in the Legislative branch. He has tended that way for a few weeks.
I switched channels, rather than watch the rest of his show, as his dialog sounded too much like something that would be on CNN.