Why Republicans MUST Subpoena Eric Ciaramella

Townhall.com ^ | November 10, 2019 | Kevin McCullough

[rktman]

First of all, what impeachment? Second, Eric who? 😲😂

[Impala64ssa]

OOOOH, NOOOO!!! Mr. McCullough mentioned that forbidden name! We're dooned!

[Ken H]

The name CIARAMELLA appears 11 times in the article.

HAHAHA!

[tired&retired]

No.. Barr should subpoena him for the grand jury.

[tired&retired]

Molly Hemingway mentioned Ciaramella on Fox News this morning.

[Lysandru]

He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named is exactly why I think that an actual impeachment vote in the House is at a less than 50% probability. Putting the matter into the hands of the GOP-controlled Senate will mean that this treacherous little pajama boy will get cross-examined by the President's defense team--under oath.

If I were the Senate GOP, I would also want the Intelligence Community IG to testify under oath as to why the rules on "whistle-blowing" were changed in August.

[chief lee runamok]

ol’ ciaramella is likely hidden deep in schiff’s secret underground bunker.

[Williams]

Except when you see comments by liberals they think Pelosi and the rest of them or valiant heroes. That’s what it’s all about.

[Hoosier-Daddy]

Now I know what it feels like to be a ham sandwich.

[sevlex]

Schiffty won’t allow ANY witnesses to be subpoenaed by gop.

[Texas Eagle]

Adam Schiff acted as everyone with a pulse believed he would. Late on Saturday he deep-sixed the rights of the accused. He trampled on the right of one to face their accuser. He hacksawed the fundamental rights of fairness, and again portrayed himself as some sort of omniscient being with final say.

Isn't that basically why Hitlery was fired from the Watergate team back in the day? She wanted to deny Nixon legal representation or some such thing.

[Logical me]

Schiff will not allow it. But the damn simple minded Senate could have a hearing.

[CMAC51]

The Republicans should show up outside the committee room, but refuse to enter unless they get to call the witnesses of their choosing, ask the questions of their choosing and their is a legal representative of the president there with full rights to ask questions. When addressed by the media, they should respond that they will only participate in a legitimate inquiry, that they refuse to participate in the kangaroo court the Democrats are conducting.

[B.O. Plenty]

You know, I think I got banned from facebook for saying this guy’s name. They are way too *sensitive*...

[Missouri gal]

She was caught trying to plant evidence.

[JoSixChip]

Ciaramella also worked with then-Vice President Biden, a name never mentioned in President Trump’s phone call

Well that's just not true. Trump mentioned bidden when he talked about bidden bragging about withholding funds until the prosecutor was fired.

[Gay State Conservative]

I hope that Sniveling Little Schitt refuses to allow him to testify. That would mean that McConnell would be justified in graveling the Senate proceedings to a vote within 10 minutes of it officially receiving it.

IIRC he's said that that's exactly what would happen.

Of course the final vote will be about 50-50 to "convict" with Pierre Delecto and at least one pal voting with the Rats.

[maxwellsmart_agent]

I agree that they should supoena him. Also, Joe Biden and his son should be called up.

[Travis McGee]