NYCs ban on what people can reasonably say is a violation of Section 1 of the 14th Amendment (14A) imo.
More specifically, Section 1 expressly prohibits the states from making laws that abridge rights that the states have amended the Constitution to expressly protect, 1st Amendment-protected right to free speech in this example, 14A expressly giving Congress the power to deal with such issues.
From the 14th Amendment:
"Section 1: All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States [emphasis added]; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
"Section 5: The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article."
H O W E V E R
We are still stuck with a worthless Congress left over from the lawless Obama Administration that will predictably continue to ignore its 14A duty to make penal laws that discourage state actors from abridging constitutionally enumerated protections, freedom of religious expression and free speech compromised in relatively recent incidents.
The remedy for constitutionally failed federal and state governments
Patriots not only need to elect a new patriot Congress that will promise to fully support PDJTs vision for MAGA, now KAG, but also consider this.
New patriot lawmakers also need to promise to do their 14A duty to make penal laws that discourage state actors from abridging constitutionally enumerated rights.
Remember in November 2020!
Can you say it out of love for your country?
If you can’t say “illegal alien” then use the word, “wetback.”
Libtarded media doesn't like it, that's tough shit. I hope they all drop dead.
“Illegal Alien is the most accurate term for it.”
It is also a “legal term” and a “Constitutional” term. (alien) and they weren’t talking about space men.
This first started with radical women’s groups objecting to the use of “man” when using the term for BOTH sexes. (How many are there now?, I digress)
Fireman, policeman, mailman, etc. We took it seriously. Instead we should have said STFU!
EVERYONE understood when used in that manner it meant BOTH men and women. The “proverbial man” as in HU-MAN. It wasn’t SEXIST! Or is that “genderist now /s.
Now, the WHOLE camel is almost in the tent!
The youth have not been educated on the Constitution or reality. They have never been challenged to look at the whole picture and make sensible decisions. They have simply been brainwashed with a liberal political agenda that has been allowed to flourish without challenge. In the video these students are all about what they feel. They have no knowledge about how the law works or that the constitution lays out what an impeachable offense is.
Listening to the youth in these days causes me to be very distraught about the future. If gives a great sense of doom about what is going to happen to the country as they age into controlling of it.
This is prove that the ideas in the communist manifesto were used to take down this country and most of the world.
opps... I posted my previous comment to the wrong thread. However there is a relationship between this an the student video thread. This is a feelings based law that has no basis in law under the constitution. It is clear violation of freedom of speech.
“I am so sorry but you are an illegal alien and I must call INS, but remember, I do so with LOVE”
There, that takes “hate” right out of the equation.
Instead of burning books, they burn words.
How about if you call them an illegal alien because they are one, no hate?
Doesn’t this violate freedom of speech?
Why not be really bold and radical and call them ‘criminal invaders?’
The biggest mistake Gen. George Washington made was not burning that nest of traitorous snakes in NYC to the ground.
“Foreign Invaders” it is, then.
Just tell them you’re not motivated by hate - you’re motivated by love for the nation and its legal citizens.
So always have a smile on your face when you utter those dasterdly words.
What a joke!
‘Sticks and stones my break my bones ,but words will...will get you 5-10 years.’
with the intent to demean, humiliate, or offend a person or persons constitutes discrimination.
We don't want to "demean, humiliate, or offend a person"...we just want to throw them out on their IIllegal Alien ass.