Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia’s top brass considers switching armor to 57mm caliber firepower
TASS Defence ^ | May 21, 2019

Posted on 05/24/2019 7:07:37 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: sukhoi-30mki

I dont think I would use that camo pattern in that environment.


21 posted on 05/25/2019 5:56:32 AM PDT by Midwesterner53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

Yeah. Gotta be somewhere where there’s enough room to shoot it. :)


22 posted on 05/25/2019 2:43:52 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Bayard
Big question is why if the 30 mm is adequate for mission performance?

Just guessing but most attack helicopters have ~30mm cannon. The 57mm may be intended to expand the anti-helicopter air defense envelope.

Another possibility is that if it can elevate near vertically, the heavier caliber may be useful in urban canyons for taking out rooftop defenders by blasting through walls at acute angles and penetrating multiple levels of poured concrete floor/ceiling.

23 posted on 05/25/2019 3:31:38 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: fso301; lurk

I don’t know if this is the same as their 57mm “Derivation” program, but one of the benefits that has been mentioned is that a gun is a more cost-effective means of shooting down drones—as mentioned in lurk’s post, than using missiles such as the Pantsir in Syria.


24 posted on 05/25/2019 8:19:42 PM PDT by Constantine XI Palaeologus ("Vicisti, Galilaee")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt

Just an observation... That gun mount looks like it could elevate to almost 90-degrees. Are they trying to develop some kind of dual-purpose, tracked light-artillery system on the backs of an IFV system? Not sure what benefit that would give them. 57-mm would be pretty anemic in terms of explosive potential.


25 posted on 05/27/2019 6:11:35 AM PDT by Tallguy (Facts be d*mned! The narrative of the day must be preserved!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: fso301

I was thinking the same, but as their is not radar emitter-receiver on the vehicle it appears that you’d have to fire at that helicopter optically.


26 posted on 05/27/2019 6:15:04 AM PDT by Tallguy (Facts be d*mned! The narrative of the day must be preserved!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson