Posted on 05/01/2019 4:30:41 PM PDT by bitt
There is no question in my mind but that it was Seth Rich, and I hope Julian Assange has the evidence somewhere safe.
Comey’s corruption of the FBI prevented them from checking out Hillary’s server and DNC servers, thus covering up potential national security leaks and other political crimes.
It is TIME that Comey and Hillary serve TIME for this, and a grand jury MUST subpoena them to testify before it. If they lie even once, it’s off to jail they go.
The whole Dem case for Russian interference into the 2016 election rests on the premise that the Russians hacked their server... and that such perfidy is the cornerstone for the claim that Hildebeest had the election stolen from her.
Furthermore, Donald Trump encouraged the Russians to hack the Dem devices to find HRC's missing emails. Therefore Trump colluded with the Bear and is thus an illegitimate President. Part of this structure is the hacking of John Podesta's emails and Russia supplying them to WikiLeaks.
This appears to all form a neat package that Trump had a plan to steal the election from its obviously destined winner, Hildy. The first problem with this scenario is that Podesta's emails were not hacked - they were carelessly given away - to who knows who? Corollary to that flaw in the scenario is the fact that WikiLeaks' Julian Assange insisted that the Russians did not supply Podesta's emails.
Which brings us to the DNC server. Already Dems have painted a picture based on the above circumstantial evidence. Now they reinforce their Russian saga with an image of the DNC server -- AND destroy the original. I am not techy enough to comment on the accuracy of a server's image, but an obvious question is: Why not supply the FBI with the original server to establish unchallengeable proof?
AG Barr has accepted this circumstantial scenario because Mueller did so in his report. Without collected proof on his own he would be foolish to do otherwise. Apparently Mueller accepted this structure because a previous FBI investigation established its bona fides. AND, who did the Hillary / DNC investigation??? By all indications it was conducted by Peter Strzok and his team.
Possibly the Bear did engineer all this intrigue, but given what we know, IMHO there is reasonable room for doubt. Do we really even know that the DNC server was hacked? Did perhaps Seth Rich supply WikiLeaks with the DNC data- and was he killed for doing so? Julian Assange contributed to Rich's burial and offered sympathy.
Is the fact of Rich's murder possible motive for the DNC to transfer suspicion of the hacking to Russia? Respected NSA tech, William Binney, has stated that the transfer of the DNC server data was at such high speed that it could not have been done otherwise than by direct download to a digital storage device - locally.
Is the truth of the hacking of the DNC server to be found here? Perhaps AG Barr will find the truth of it.
They HAMMERED Barr today over his “Taking Muller At His Word” investigation of all the background material, witnesses and documents. He said he didn’t look at that material because he had the expert opinion of Muller who DID. I was screaming at the video “OF COURSE WE SHOULD LOOK AT THE BACKGROUND MATERIAL JUST AS WE MUST LOOK AT THE SERVER EVEN THOUGH THE FBI ALREADY CLEARED IT.”
Why not make a mirror for use during the campaign, and then give the originals to the FBI?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.