Posted on 04/09/2019 9:29:47 PM PDT by bitt
In the end, it will read like this....
“Mistakes were made, solutions and safeguards have been discussed and put in place, we’ll do better next time...”
Those of us in law enforcement call it a clue. We are not big believers in coincidences when there re no other logical explanations.
You now impersonating a licensed mental health professional? Nothing would surprise me. You don’t live in a reality that the rest of us inhabit but rather your own immature, make-believe world where the President sends some of his true blue supporters coded messages written by anonymous people who get to make a little money on the side scamming stupid and gullible people. My guess is that you are one of these scammers. No mature adult would otherwise spend so much time and energy on a lark unless you are profiting. You know like, Hayes and trazybeans.
It’s like I have told you before, people may laugh at your childish teenage antics, but they don’t really take you seriously. You are just a diversion. An escape from work down at the manure plant. The Oracle of Unicorns you might say.
All things about you considered I definitely would be careful calling out other better educated aNd smarter people.
Careful or the coward will threaten you by PM...
Ahahahaha. Good one, puker.
Don't you claim to be some kind of derp state prosecutor from DC?
Seems to me that you're part of the problem, if that's even true. Until then you're just another anonymous internet troll. And besides, your so-called "intelligence" doesn't shine through in your feeble postings.
My left nut is smarter than you.
"Those of us in law enforcemt…" Ahahahahaha. You're killin' me Smalls.
Somebody save me.
HEY!
I ain't worked at the manure plant sine the late 90's.
Get it right.
‘Roosters don’t really make the sun rise.’
(admiration!)
Uh-oh, DJT just said “What they did was TREASON”....
:)
But but but that’s just a distraction “I’m beginning to think Trump is in on it” LOL
LOL
“We are not big believers in coincidences when there re no other logical explanations.”
Except that post hoc propter hoc reasoning isn’t logic. It’s a logical error, a very popular one. When you dismiss Cate’s line of reasoning because you think it is too similar to Q stuff, you’re not engaged in logic you’re guessing and ignoring countervailing evidence.
One large clue going against your case is that Cates has never once referenced Q. He developed his thesis about Spygate using publicly available information that he refers to in his writing. Never has it been the magical entrail readings from “Q droppings”.
Don't mess with DJT or you will pay the price.
I strongly agree with both of those statements!
It makes me chuckle when they stamp their feet and demand to see the full report. Bring it!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.