Posted on 03/24/2019 7:43:38 AM PDT by COUNTrecount
Since when do the Demonrats give a whit about the law!
If Nadler doesn’t like what Barr releases by law. Nadler can change it.
Fatassed loser, Barr can’t divulge security info, info on people not charge with a crime, and likely lots of this info will be tied up in subsequent and ongoing investigations and prosecutions.
Trump could dump lots we do know of Democrat paying Russia to create the McCain Dossier.
Sam Powers, lyin Sue Rice should have immunity stripped so we can get to know Obama’s involvement.
Comey bragged he leaked docs to get a special council appointed. The Leaking was a crime, and the SC was against the rules that you need a crime to appoint a SC, this was a fishing trip, turned into a witch hunt.
I want SC and Grand Juries and punishment of all Trump’s Coup conspirators. And lets investigate Mueller Uranium one
and his prosecutorial misconduct.
In that episode, Simmons was investigating a conspiracy organized by the captain, and every bit of contrary evidence was excused as another link in the conspiracy. Eventually, everybody surrounding the captain was a conspirator.
Republicans need to influence events to the point where Nadler is calling everyone an obstructer of justice for simply following the laws or refusing to cooperate with him. Make the charge of obstruction sound like the boy who cried wolf.
Once everyone becomes a conspirator, nobody is a conspirator, and the accuser looks like a nut.
-PJ
Fat Jerry seek professional help you delusional POS.
The fat f*ck knows if it’s released the Rats can cherry pick the crap out of it and provide endless out of context ammunition.
Nadler and other Democrats are also seeking the release of the underlying information that led Mueller to his findings.
They are actively and Publicly Conspiring to Violate Federal Law, AG Barr should go to the Grand Jury and INDICT NADLER post haste!
Somebody ought to hand Old Nads his teeth in a snack Baggie.
Unless I’m guessing totally wrong, the democrats will be wishing that it wasn’t released the day after they get what they are demanding. I believe a full release will shred the RATS and their leadership and show them to have conspired instead.
If there is no discernible mud on DJT in the Report the screaming charges of COVERUP!!! will be heard all in the land.
It would be ‘cover-up’ for Barr to withhold Mueller reportI didn't hear you spewing your "cover up" bile when the DOJ,FBI Etc. withheld documents from the last congress...TWO FACED ASSHOLE!
Nadler wants to hold Trump “accountable” .. if no one else will pursue this witch hunt, he will.
Chase on, Dude.
Jerry the Hutt is just tryin’ to keep the ‘RATS’ coup alive.
Is Bob Mueller going to give Jerry Nadler a long over due Golden Shower? Just sayin
I quote Mark Levin, who was on “Sunday Morning Fox and Friends”:
“Bill Barr is not part of the Postal Service where he picks up the report and gives it to Congress. This regulation has been in place for 20 years since the Clinton Administration: His job is to look at this report, to make sure there isn’t secret 6-C grand jury information which legally is not to be made public. It’s his job to make sure that FBI raw notes—301s—are not to be distributed publicly. And, believe it or not, it’s his job to make sure that people are not smeared who haven’t been charged. Bill Barr and the executive branch, they are not the impeachment arm of the House of Representatives for the Democrats. The Special Council report to the Attorney General is not and impeachment report for the House Democrats.”
Mark Levin then quotes Watergate Special Prosecutor, Leon Jaworski:
“For the Watergate Special Prosecutor to make public the evidence it gathered concerning the former President and others who were not charged with criminal offenses, would add to the abuse of power to those that led to the creation of the Special Prosecutor’s office. The federal rules of criminal procedure prohibit the disclosure of information presented to a grand jury except as necessary in the course of criminal proceedings. . . . Most important, in terms of the American Constitutional system of government, is the notion of fundamental fairness for those who, after investigation, have not been charged with any criminal misconduct. This consideration is particularly important for a special prosecutor, whose independence considerably reduces his accountability and must be unusually sensitive to possible abuses of power. It is a basic axiom of our system of justice that every man is innocent until proven guilty after judicial proceedings designed to protect his rights to insure a fair adjudication of the charges against him. Where not charges are brought, it would be irresponsible and unethical for a prosecutor to issue a report suggesting criminal conduct on the part of an individual who has no effective means of challenging the allegations against him or of requiring the prosecutor to establish charges beyond a reasonable doubt.”
Spot on! It goes right along with what Mark Levin said on “Sunday Morning Fox and Friends” today. I give a transcription of his words in my Post #38.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.