Posted on 09/23/2018 7:05:30 PM PDT by TigerClaws
HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAH of course she does. Blind Freddie saw this coming. They are hoping for their Blue Wave to come and save them. Get people out to vote and put these evil people back into their caves!
???
The first accuser, Ford, is the psychology professor.
What do you mean not same woman? Haven’t seen what profession the 2nd accuser is..
Fuck her. Vote this man in. I am sorry about my language, but she can fuck off
This is one of those times when cussing is perfectly allowable. This whole thing pisses me off.
My saw this coming a mile away comment was in response to the title about Feinstein calling to postpone the hearing. She/they knew that more accusations were coming since they no doubt are involved in creating them..
Totally. I am livid..this shit has to stop.
Thanks TigerClaws.
Mitch cant lose but one
New Yorker can’t even claim the story is true, but they ran it anyway.
“The New Yorker has not confirmed with other eyewitnesses that Kavanaugh was present at the party. “
The left's only hope is that Kavanaugh removes himself from the running.
They want to make the nomination of a Conservative to SCOTUS the kiss of death for that person.
A circus so fithy, slanderous and threatening that no one in their right mind would put their reputation and family through it.
he also asked for a bunch of documents that should imo include her psych dr notes where she said 4 boys..
delay until its too late
this is the plan
and i bet the GOPe leadership will agree to it
instead of doing their jobs and confirming this
well-qualified nominee now that nobody’s come up with a single credible charge against him
And of course each new allegation will be worse than the one before it. Now he was putting his thing in the girl’s face and making her touch it...even though she was so drunk she isn’t sure of the facts but that she knows...sure.
Then the Creepy Porn Lawyer has to come out with an even better one, Kavanaugh and pals having sex parties with drunk girls only as their prey.
This is pure insanity and must stop. Creepy Porn Lawyer just helps to make it all that more unbelievable. Democrats always go too far and have really done it this time. They learned nothing with their fake dossier. May they all rot in hell as soon as possible.
I most feel sorry for Kavanuagh’s daughters having to see their father torn to shreds by these disgusting people, all for the children they are. They prove they will stop at nothing for power.
Keep the House and Senate in session through the election, if necessary.
Thank you. I am so pissed. I hate what we have become. My forefathers came here in the early 1700’s. My family fought in the revolutionary war. My GRand Father fought in wwII, Dad Vietnam, in the A-4 VM, three uncles one in F4 two on the ground. My brother flew F-16’s. My son is a Marine. I cannot tell you what he does.
he let the wolf into the hen house, and the chaos ensued.....
call the vote....if K passes, he passes, if he doesn't he doesn't....
THE PUBS ARE THE MAJORITY, FOR NOW....ACT LIKE IT....
This is beyond bizarre. Seriously. Forget the salacious details in the story . the construct of the story is so stunningly flawed it is jaw-dropping as presented.
The New Yorker runs an article about an accusation made by a woman named Deborah Ramirez (53, pictured right) about a freshman party at Yale, where she claims she was in a drunken stupor and Judge Brett Kavanaugh, then 18, pulled out his penis during a drinking game.
Etc. Etc. Etc . Really, no need to go further.
Why?
Because despite their search, and discussions with dozens of potential witnesses
The magazine contacted several dozen classmates of Ramirez and Kavanaugh regarding the incident
.the New Yorker was unable to find a single witness to corroborate the story being made by the accuser. None. Not a single confirming witness to back up the claim. They write:
The New Yorker has not confirmed with other eyewitnesses that Kavanaugh was present at the party.
But wait.
It gets better.
The accuser did give the New Yorker six names to support her claim. Six witnesses Deborah Ramirez stated could substantiate her accusation. And when the New Yorker interviewed them, ALL SIX said it never happened.
[ ] In a statement, two of those male classmates who Ramirez alleged were involved the incident, the wife of a third male student she said was involved, and three other classmates, Dino Ewing, Louisa Garry, and Dan Murphy, disputed Ramirezs account of events: We were the people closest to Brett Kavanaugh during his first year at Yale. He was a roommate to some of us, and we spent a great deal of time with him, including in the dorm where this incident allegedly took place. Some of us were also friends with Debbie Ramirez during and after her time at Yale.
We can say with confidence that if the incident Debbie alleges ever occurred, we would have seen or heard about itand we did not. The behavior she describes would be completely out of character for Brett. In addition, some of us knew Debbie long after Yale, and she never described this incident until Bretts Supreme Court nomination was pending. Editors from the New Yorker contacted some of us because we are the people who would know the truth, and we told them that we never saw or heard about this. (The Article)
Now, stop for a minute and think about this.
A claim is made.
The New Yorker tries to substantiate the claim.
The New Yorker finds ZERO people who can validate the claim.
The six witnesses the accuser says will back up her claim all deny any knowledge of the claim; yet the New Yorker still runs the article.
100% of the evidence discovered by the New Yorker refutes the claim.
Yet they publish it.
Enter the Star Chamber
.
Nope.
They just need to be first and this was the only way be the lede on Monday...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.