“Dr. Ford may well have been the victim of a severe sexual assault by someone 36 years ago”
And how do we know this?
He misses the point - the Dems don’t care to discover the truth of what happened (if anything even did). It’s about delaying the vote until the election.
Totally plausible
Ford named 4 boys ( or 3 boys and a girl ) who were at the party and gave a general location
Using the location and the fact that the party had to be at one of the kids’ houses, Whelan figured it out
Candidate is an uncanny Kavanaugh lookalike whose house matches the details provided by Ford
Forget theories, it did not happen.
https://twitter.com/EdWhelanEPPC/status/1042893987747713024
Makes sense...If she had come forward early this could have been looked at without dragging everyone through the mud.
I hope democrats don’t push this woman into a suicide... that would work for them but it would be horribly sad.
Of course, we still have no information to go on, as we don’t even have the actual accusation letter, and the WP article was short on any actual facts.
I don’t know why Whelen thought charging another boy with rape without any evidence was a good idea.
But he did bring up one very good point — how could 5 people be partying at a house, and none of them live there?
It’s not like Ford said “we were at my house” — definitely not. And she didn’t say it was her friend’s house (in te WP article she used a plural for the “girls” she was with, suggesting there was more than 1 female other than here there, which means more than 4 others total). But she gave a location that didn’t match with the homes of the 3 men who she accuses of being at the party.
“She only had one beer” — so of course she’d remember exactly who the guy was. Except she can’t even remember the day it happened, or what house she had gone to, or who took here there, or how she got home. She has a memory solely of the attack, and a convenient “memory” of how she wasn’t so drunk that she wouldn’t know what was happening.
Saw on FOX just now that Whelan is walking that back. Saying he shouldn’t have involved Garrett. Geez, people are such wimps these days. Always on the apology wagon.
By naming the guy, it seems to me that he’s setting himself up for a possible libel suit.
Now he’s deleted it. A little wimpy.