An Extremely Detailed Map of the 2016 Election

New York Times ^

[Mr. Jeeves]

It’s pretty obvious in my area: homeowners for Trump, apartment-dwellers for Hillary.

[Yaelle]

How to see this without paying? I even already pay for the cooking part of the NYT but I don’t want to pay for the politics.

[Fresh Wind]

It would be interesting to see congressional districts overlaid on that map.

[Fedora]

I would love to see detailed analysis on what makes city dwellers so much more likely to be far left liberal democrats.

City political machines control unions and newspapers using mob muscle and propaganda tactics, while using welfare as the carrot on the stick.

[thesearethetimes...]

Bkmk

[Amendment10]

If patriots would support Pres. Trump in leading the states to repeal the ill-conceived 17th Amendment, and politically “force” the feds to surrender state powers that they have stolen from the states back to the states, we’d be much less concerned about election maps imo.

• “Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.

• ”... the care of the property, the liberty, and the life of the citizen, under the solemn sanction of an oath imposed by your Federal Constitution, is in the States, and not in the Federal Government [emphases added].” —Rep. John Bingham, Congressional Globe, 1866. (See about middle of 3rd column.)

The 16th Amendment, the amendment that effectively repealed the involuntary servitude aspect of the 13th Amendment imo, needs to disappear too.

• 13th Amendment:

  • Section 1: Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

  • Section 2: Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

• 16th Amendment: The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.

• "The smart crooks long ago figured out that getting themselves elected to federal office to make unconstitutional tax laws to fill their pockets is a much easier way to make a living than robbing banks." —me

• "Federal career lawmakers probably laugh all the way to the bank to deposit bribes for putting loopholes for the rich and corporations in tax appropriations laws, Congress actually not having the express constitutional authority to make most appropriations laws where domestic policy is concerned. Such laws are based on stolen state powers and uniquely associated stolen state revenues." —me

[outpostinmass2]

I don’t pay, and I can see it find.

[Sa-teef]

"Welfare dependency followed by single women are the 2 biggest voting blocks of the Democrat party. Cities have large amounts of both....."

Definitely.

Killary won the post graduates by a mile and edged out the four year graduates slightly.

But the most telling stats I have found about Kankles constituency is in income level. Hillary dominated the under $30k income demographics and led by nearly 10% with the 30 to 49.9k earners. Trump led in all of the four groups covered in the 50k income levels upward.

https://www.businessinsider.com/exit-polls-who-voted-for-trump-clinton-2016-11#by-income-clinton-led-only-among-voters-with-a-2015-family-income-under-50000-a-group-that-included-36-of-the-voters-in-the-exit-polls-4

I need to find statistics about how many of her low earning voters were actually employed? It would be no big surprise to find that the Killary voters would hold the distinction of having a much higher unemployment rate.

[centurion316]

The press use state wide or nationwide poll data and trends to measure things like Blue Waves. Real professionals work at the precinct level, always. The reason that those professionals go it so wrong in 2016 is that this result on this map did not match the historical data of previous elections. The conventional wisdom is that since this year’s election is a midterm and since “everyone” hate Trump, the map of this election will not look like this one, the map will look like previous elections except with more Blue. The people who are making those assumptions all live in those Blue enclaves and that’s where most of the predictions originate.

I think that this year’s election will look more like the 2016 map which will be good for Trump and good for the American people, but that’s no scientific analysis. In fact, I think that the Trump camp will get more support this time, because Trump has delivered across the board and no one wants tax increases, demise of ICE, and the Socialist takeover of the Democrat Party. Not a good time to be a Democrat.

[outpostinmass2]

Don’t forget in a rate of 2 to 1 the Democrats lose women every time they get married. It is one of the biggest gains for Republicans.

[outpostinmass2]

I wasn’t a big Trump supporter when I voted for him since he used to be a Democrat and palled around with a lot of the top Democrats. So far I couldn’t be happier with my choice.

[Bloody Sam Roberts]

Wow. A veritable sea of red. Like the clam flats in Buzzards Bay in the Summer at low tide.

[Bloody Sam Roberts]

An interesting note.

Take a look at Irvine California....South of LA where the 405 and the 5 intersect Southeast of Rt. 133. Zoom in and locate the El Toro Marine Corps Air Station.

Half of the area (Marine Way) shows white and the popup says 99% Hillary. The other half (Where Irvine Blvd. splits it) Shows 67% Hillary.

Somehow...I doubt those numbers are accurate.

[ConservativeMind]

Then, I would say, the Democrats will lose, mightily.

[freeandfreezing]

If you look at New Hampshire you can still see the effect of even a modest urban area. Portsmouth and Concord voted for Clinton, most smaller towns did not. And in the Hanover area and the Durham area the college types push the scale to the left.

There are a few other enclaves of liberals, along with a couple of old mill towns where Democrats have the lead. But they aren't, contrary to popular belief, the towns where refugees from Massachusetts settle.

[ken in texas]

You don’t need to pay. I got it just fine without sending them a cent.

[x]

Great map, but some of the precincts are very small indeed: nine voters, five voters, three voters.

It seems like more people would be counting the votes in those precincts than are actually voting.

[fhayek]

I was calling it (and 'celebrating') early election night. I was on Facebook, and my extremely intelligent brother was dismissing my call. I had one of those Electoral Vote calculators dialed in. Trump NEEDED Florida, Ohio, North Carolina to win. Once he won those, the path for Hillary became tough. Losing any one of Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin...meant curtains. PA looked solid for Trump, and I said it was over. Of course he won them all. Best Erection Ever.

[Yaelle]

I’ve looked at too many articles there this month. So they won’t let me in, the jerks.

[goodolemr]

Behind the scenes, the Clinton people could see they were going to lose. Obama had to convince her to call Trump. The networks refused to call it and some where going crazy that Trump would take the stage, oh wait, Hillary conceded, so then supposedly Trump Elected graphic comes up.

Definitely an interesting night, sometimes I look at different coverage on youtube to get a chuckle. I am nervous about 2020. The attacks on President Trump is just never-ending, but if he gets his second term, he can really do some good at correcting some problems inflicted on our country, I think.