Posted on 04/01/2018 8:07:12 PM PDT by BBell
You get a 50 year sentence but only serve 2/3rds of it as a multiple murderer. The injustice system reeks.
It should have been 10 non-consecutive sentences, one for each victim, and then he would have died before 2/3 of that combined time was up.
I think you meant consecutive. It is concurrent where the sentences are served simultaneously.
You are 100% correct. I’ll call alzheimers my excuse and thank you for setting my post straight.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.