Posted on 03/13/2018 7:00:29 AM PDT by lowbuck
It’s useful for assembling and trying to make sense of a mass of details which are hard to remember and understand...but I saw no mention of Seth Rich. Rather, the author assumes that the Russians were the source of the Podesta emails which were released and showed how the Democratic primaries had been rigged.
Incredible article.
Thanks for posting, I found it on Twitter this morning too.
Bump
Good point.
I am certain Seth Rich was the leak from the DNC and that he was killed for it.
This is the definitive analysis of one of the most shameful cons in our nation’s political history. This is true journalism and the writer deserves a Pulitzer. https://t.co/VgfFPnfTjj— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) March 17, 2018
Two clearly felonious activities glitter within this pile of political dung: first, the incredible abuse of classified information and its leakage to the media; second, the deliberate abuse of the FISA system to effect a level of illicit surveillance that makes Watergate look like the amateur job it was. These are all legitimate grounds for criminal prosecution. Less easy to punish is the systemic contempt for the trust placed in these individuals by the American people and their abuse of position for purposes of what amounts to pure vanity. Not one of these fools would amount to anything at all were it not for that trust, which was just as systemically betrayed. Firing seems too mild a punishment, but we're lucky to see even that.
Everyone needs to read it from beginning to end.
I agree with you, but, the fact is that most Americans have a very limited attention span. Blame it on TV with 8 minutes of program and 90 seconds of commercials. I don't know.
I posted this as many Freepers will take the time to read, evaluate and share the contents of an extremely long article.
For our fellow citizens, we need to focus on giving them something that can be read and understood in about 20 seconds. That is just the way life is.
As I have mentioned on other posts, I lived through Watergate. It takes a lot of reporting to catch the attention of the masses. And then, you must only have a brief, easy to understand and digest, mention of the crime.
That is why I keep hammering on FISAgate. A crime that is easy to understand and the average Joe can relate too. If this is done right the wrong doers will never see the hammer coming until the people hammer them.
As always, just my 2¢
Thanks Lowbuck for posting... A great read! And I am glad that Michael Doran wrote this article. It is about time!
Rhinohunter, you need to read this!
Incredible article. I just read it over on NRO and came here to post it but note you already did. I thought of posting it again, it’s just that good.
Thanks for getting this out there. Pulitzer worthy indeed!
Bookmark
Do not despair. The true narrative is emerging in the counter media, but it will take time to reach most Americans. This summary is good. Dan Bongino’s summary is good. The three 7 minute videos at CTH featuring DiGenova are good. The scope and breadth of what occurred is stunning.
The dam has broken and it is time for another special counsel to be convened along with a grand jury to fully investigate the events surrounding the election. It is fantastic that Trump just hired DiGenova, the man who pulls no punches in his explanation and understanding of what occurred. Talk about a shot across the bow..... any substantial charges against the President will now certainly come with a vigorous counterattack providing access to discovery and the compelling of witnesses to testify under oath.
Trust me - those who perpetrated this sedition just got a gut punch when DiGenova joined the legal team. Here is a man who is begging for a fight and someone who fully understands the tools that will be at his disposal to mount his counterattack.
p - Q posted this article today -
long but very good
Excerpt from the piece quotes former cia chief dicussing steele’s “fbi handler” meeting steele in rome leaves the impression the fibbers were weaponised & directly involved early on in the creation of the dossier:
This process, Morell said, “takes you nowhere.”
Steele’s report was, in a word, junk. And Morell, the man who expressed that opinion, was not just a seasoned intelligence professional; he was also a staunch supporter of Hillary Clinton for president. Nor did Steele’s FBI handler in Rome set off an alarm in Washington, because he, presumably, was also a seasoned professional who knew junk when he saw it. And he had many additional reasons to doubt the veracity of Steele’s reporting — reasons that Morell refrained from broaching. How, for example, could Steele be sure that the former FSB officers in his network were fully retired? The convoluted pipeline between Moscow and London gave Russian intelligence too many opportunities to inject disinformation into the flow of reports to London.
Do you know the difference between Putin and Hillary?
Putin can win an election rigged in his favor...
:^O you have changed your tagline . . . Just as I was wiring up the bleachers!
For later.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.