Skip to comments.
Trump White House Preparing To Replace Liberal Supreme Court Justice?
DCWhispers ^
| January 28, 2018
| DCWhispers
Posted on 01/28/2018 7:15:00 PM PST by mairdie
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 301-302 next last
To: mairdie
221
posted on
01/29/2018 2:34:51 AM PST
by
Vermont Lt
(Burn. It. Down.)
To: mairdie
Democrats in Congress are said to be warning White House staff of a prolonged and brutal fight should President Trump attempt to replace a liberal Justice with a hardline-conservative nominee. 1. I hope the spineless party will simply hold hearings and vote. No opportunity for delay.
2. I hope President Trump will nominate the most qualified person for the job, a candidate who believes the Constitution means exactly what it says.
I'm a lot more comfortable with my faith in President Trump than I am with The Turtle.
222
posted on
01/29/2018 2:38:13 AM PST
by
Pollster1
("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
To: prophetic
You’ve just created an image that will forever stick in my mind.
223
posted on
01/29/2018 3:06:43 AM PST
by
mairdie
To: Kalamata
224
posted on
01/29/2018 3:11:09 AM PST
by
mairdie
To: mairdie; All
Nothing but baseless rumors.
Spit.
225
posted on
01/29/2018 3:15:36 AM PST
by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
To: kaehurowing
invoke the Nuclear Option, aka the Harry Reid Rule.They already did that, like the demonRATs say, "That train has already sailed":)
226
posted on
01/29/2018 3:33:40 AM PST
by
USS Alaska
(Kill all mooselimb, terrorist savages, with extreme prejudice! Deus Vult!)
To: mairdie
Justice Sotomayor . . . is said to be struggling greatly with her workload as she deals with a worsening diabetes condition. Let's all cheer her up. You know, maybe send her some boxes of candy to make her feel better.
227
posted on
01/29/2018 3:33:43 AM PST
by
Hardastarboard
(Three most annoying words on the internet - "Watch the Video")
To: mairdie
If Trump gets to appoint one or more Supremes his election will have been worth it.
To: mairdie
Notice how all of the concern and planning on the side of the liberals is how to prop up the dysfunctional, ill, and half dead liberal justices?
Not a care or thought of what is best for America.
As long as they can claim that people like Ginsberg and Sotomayor are still alive and breathing their liberal staffs can push the liberal agenda by doing the work and voting for them.
229
posted on
01/29/2018 4:01:42 AM PST
by
Vlad The Inhaler
(The only trannie I want to see is a Muncie 4 speed M-22 Rock Crusher)
To: volunbeer
I’m really surprised that the muslim homo commies in DC, did not assassinate RBG in the last year or so of Obama.
230
posted on
01/29/2018 4:02:40 AM PST
by
DCBryan1
(No realli, moose bytes can be quite nasti!)
To: Hardastarboard
I’m supposed to buy Girl Scout Cookies from my nephew’s adorable daughter. (Great niece? Grand niece? I don’t know.) Hated to do it, considering the Girl Scouts are horrid, but if I could have them be sent to Sotomayour it might be worth it.
To: Vlad The Inhaler
If Obama was still in office, and one of our conservative judges was in danger of being replaced, I would consider it to be best for America to have their staffs doing the work and voting for them. Stuff them, if necessary, but save us from liberal justices. SO grateful for Trump and the problem being for THEM and not US.
232
posted on
01/29/2018 4:06:53 AM PST
by
mairdie
To: mairdie
a threesome of such a magnitude that it would be the shot that would be heard around the world
233
posted on
01/29/2018 4:07:56 AM PST
by
eartick
(Been to the line in the sand and liked it, but ready to go again)
To: dsrtsage
Now if Trump can find a black transgendered lesbian wiccan super conservative,
You left off “of high moral conviction” or did you mean conservative to cover that.
234
posted on
01/29/2018 4:11:16 AM PST
by
eartick
(Been to the line in the sand and liked it, but ready to go again)
To: OrangeHoof
By contrast, the second choice will seem more reasonable than the first one yet is really just as conservative but not as openly so. He/she would have to not be a Souter and, if it is a female judge being replaced, the Dems will likely insist it be a woman.Ok...give them Ann Coulter or Laura Ingram, or Judge Pirro.
235
posted on
01/29/2018 4:12:52 AM PST
by
DCBryan1
(No realli, moose bytes can be quite nasti!)
To: blam
Trump winning the election was a miracle. PROOF that God has not given up on us yet.....
236
posted on
01/29/2018 4:18:38 AM PST
by
Erik Latranyi
(Liberal bastions are full of misogyny, drugs, pedophilia and racism (Hollywood, Academia, DC))
To: mrsmith
Dershowitz is the only liberal worth considering, even if Hillary were president, he is the only liberal worth considering by the senate.
To: mairdie
238
posted on
01/29/2018 4:19:40 AM PST
by
kenmcg
(tHE WHOLE)
To: spintreebob
There will be no SC nominees in their late 70s. Likely nominees won’t be much past 60. Neil Gorsuch is 50.
239
posted on
01/29/2018 4:25:01 AM PST
by
jjotto
("Ya could look it up!")
To: raiderboy
Ruth Buzzy, woa that’s a wayback machine..I can see her hitting the guy on the tricycle in a raincoat with her purse now..thanks lol
240
posted on
01/29/2018 4:26:25 AM PST
by
aces
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 301-302 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson