[Envisioning]

Anybody else seeing this?

[Eric in the Ozarks]

Having Michael isikoff is worrysome...

[norwaypinesavage]

" Why now?"

Now that the Clintons have been relegated to the dust bin of forgotten history, the press can finally tell the truth about them.

[bitt]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DuOqqTvifhU

ping for unbelievably deep reporting of Clinton crimes...

[bigbob]

I wasn’t going to watch it, but when I tuned in Paula Jones’ lawyer was saying how she could describe details of Slick Willie’s willie, and I got hooked. Very well done and interesting to relive that time period knowing what we know now, and to see all the other events of the day put into the timeline.

[fkabuckeyesrule]

I’ve been watching the past two weeks. Its a pretty interest show and its nice to be reminded of some of the characters from that era that I had forgotten.

[Angels27]

This show leaves me feeling they are trying to vindicate the Clintons

[Art in Idaho]

I started to watch it but just couldn’t take it. It always depresses me when I think the combined Bush Senior and Ross Perot vote was 56.3% vs Slick Willies 43.0% Let that be a lesson to 3rd party and Libertarian voters. We got the Clintons and here we are. . . and man, have we paid for it. You got 100 pages? I could go on and on.

[Cementjungle]

Saw it... it seemed to whitewash a lot of the Clinton crimes

[Hostage]

2006 Wallace said he felt like a ton of bricks was coming down on him:

Clinton the Great Excuse-Maker

You see, the left, the democrats, they don't think in terms of American individuals making great achievements. They think of cover stories and bringing down their opposition. If things go wrong, they think of blaming the right, never persons of conservative ideology. Clinton was a master at this. He and his psychopathic spouse 'loathed' the military and the 'right-wing' so much, that truth and excellence were made subordinate to the urgency of pinning the blame for their failures on this domestic enemy. They lied so much, they scowled at any facts that did not support their lie. Their lies were pathological lies, they came to believe their own lies.

The Clintons were always small-time crooks from a corrupt backwater state. They knew only how to push people to get money into their control for a variety of cover issues such as education, climate change, healthcare, pro-choice women's rights, higher taxes, open borders. They always looked at issues as a process of getting some official to sound off the way they wanted it to sound, then find a way to rake in the cash on the backend. Their yardstick for progress was in measuring how gullible the public was, how well they played the charade, how much money came under their control. They did not have the inspirational power, character, know-how, to get people to be excellent. They always looked at situations as which people were loyal to them, and of those, they sought who could be manipulated and used for their purposes. Using people for one's purposes is not necessarily a bad thing unless the purposes are for an enrichment of themselves or of persons they control. It simply was never about what was good for America.

[Herakles]

So when are they going to get to Vince Foster, or the official who was shot in the head before his plane crashed in Europe, the same one where the female stewardess survive but died on the helicopter flight from the accident from a slashed artery in her leg (Brown? ), and how about Seth Rich?