Posted on 01/25/2018 8:43:20 PM PST by Innovative
Read the article. It says ALL in a mini-headline down below.... BEFORE the article starts.
"Bad Strzok! Bad Page! You've been a naughty boy and naughty girl. Don't ever do that again or else I'll be forced to put a note in your file. No dessert for either of you tonight! Now go to your rooms!"
That’s what I noticed, too. The article says “ongoing effort”. Nothing suggests they retrieved all of them.
They were in Andrew McCabe's Recycle Bin.
I see the negative naysaying nabobs have descended as usual. May they find that being all OCD tied up in their nit-picking underwear becomes more and more ... constricting.
In all the brouhaha, did anyone else notice that 50,000 messages over a six month time frame is an absolutely insane rate?
This is off-the-wall-psychotic-girlfriend level frequency, 10 messages/hour night and day.
OK. So, we don't know how the author or the experts involved define and determine "all" in this matter at this point.
Nevertheless, the gist is--that it must be close enough to all that the differences between what's discovered so far and what CAN ultimately be discovered is negligible--except, of course, in the mysterious hollow spaces between the ears of the contrarians--who seem to assign such arcane details to the supremely highest priority in this galactic cluster.
Sigh.
And, we don't know what percentage of all the emails on given phones/computers were those dealing with the specific topic(s) of the investigation vs all emails to everyone on their social networks about whatever topics.
It’s not a caption to a picture, it’s a few lines below the picture and makes no reference to the picture but to the story. It’s another headline; it’s also the headline on the photo of the Fox News show.
Uh, oh. Someone’s going to prison.
They will need to match up recovered TEXT from the messages with available meta-data on the texting. So folks, please reserve judgment on this until all the facts are in.
I knew where they were.
I guess some of them contain the A word from what I hear.
Regardless, use []’s. It’s syntaxtely correct and ()’s are not.
That is if you want to excerpt properly.
Yes it is
No it isn’t
Yes it is,
No it isn’t
What?
It’s the blatant partisan politicization of the highest levels of national law enforcement.
Tweeeeeeeeet! FOUL!!!
And yes. Treason. If we have these things corrupted by political motives.
Listen to Redneck Revolution DEMO by Daniel Levy 12 #np on #SoundCloud
https://soundcloud.com/daniel-levy-6/redneck-revolution-demo
Now all we need is a copy of the classified and conspiracy emails they were sending on their gmail accounts. Where is the DOJ on this? How do they still have jobs?
An average Joe lies to an official for an inconsequential reason, and his life can be thoroughly destroyed — destroyed by the same type of scumbags that lied about the potentially seditious text messages.
Notm treason which ia defined in the Constitution as actually levying waqr against the United States or adhering to the enemies of the United states . What we are seeing is cells in the highest levels of the National Security apparatus openly engaged in SEDITION& the Democrats will gladly encourage them & the GOP is still friggen STUPID enough to think tht they can work with the DEMOCRATS
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.