More Guardian Garbage.
.
Everybody knows that “studies” make claims that are 100% true.
Can they really be called scientists when they Ignore the Fact that temperatures always rise first- 800 or so years Before CO2 rises? If they ignore the facts- then they prove they are not true objective scientists, but rather scientists with a political agenda which ignores facts
No warming in 20 years despite rising CO2 levels- woopsie- another inconvenient fact
Easy Peasy. No anthropomorphic climate change.... no climate change costs.
Dead issue.
lolz. I laughed out loud when scrolling down and seeing that image you posted as first comment about this joke of an article.
It was still hotter and dryer in the 1930s than now.
Hey Spunky. Who's we? You got a mouse in your pocket?
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Bad Math, start out with a false proposition and everything that follows will be false. by 1Old Pro |
There is no man made climate change, therefore there is no cost. Just a matter of time before Trump rectifies this BS.
Yeah, we in Trump Country are oh-so-worried (I pull my right lower eyelid down to show you). World’s smallest violin plays....
Wait, so it will be less felt in the widely scattered blue areas only?
One faction of the left is obsessed with the idea that Trump voters and Republican voters vote against their own self interest.
This faction of the left is obsessed with the idea that we need to be re-educated as to what is in our own best self interest.
This article is an example of what we can expect from that leftist faction. We will see article after article that tries to convince us that personal freedom is not in our own best interest. They will try to convince us that we should not make decisions for ourselves. We should listen to the experts... their designated experts ... who have dedicated themselves to telling us what is best for us.
The author couldn’t even get past the first sentence before squatting and pushing out the first lie.