Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

A judge blocked this a couple days before it was to begin but a different judge has reinstated, to begin on Wednesday 08/02/17. Looks like a boost in business for all the store just over the Cook county line.
1 posted on 07/31/2017 5:10:57 AM PDT by sleeper-has-awakened
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last
To: sleeper-has-awakened
I see that many people responding to this thread have fallen into the trap of arguing whether or not these types of drinks are healthy for you. Instead of debating the legality of these onerous additional taxes being imposed, we are instead debating the merits of the argument that these drinks are unhealthy. This is exactly what the nanny staters want!

I remember years ago how anti-smokers and teetotalers rubbed their hands in glee as "sin" taxes were imposed on tobacco and alcoholic beverages. We told them back then that eventually they would soon come after food items deemed unhealthy by the nanny staters and they told us that was nonsense, that tobacco and alcohol was as far as they would go.

59 posted on 07/31/2017 8:07:18 AM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sleeper-has-awakened

Those on SNAP benefits do not have to pay sales tax. So unless they ban the purchase of “sugary” beverages the only ones that will be paying the additional tax would be those paying cash.


72 posted on 08/09/2017 8:33:08 AM PDT by Bluebeard16
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson