“All it needs now is “royal consent” from the House of Commons...”
I don’t have anything to add to the substantive comments on this travesty others have made here — but, in the interest of accuracy (or something):
The correct terminology is “royal assent”; and, as the name suggests, it involves the Queen (or her representative, the Governor General) signing off on a bill passed by Parliament (which, btw, includes both the House of Commons, and the Senate).
BTW, the Queen rarely exercises a veto power similar to the U.S. President’s. (By “rarely”, I mean never in the past hundred and fifty years or so; but, it is still a theoretical possibility. Of course, if a veto were exercised, that would probably mean the end of the Monarchy.) IOW, Royal assent is a given.
Time for a wall on the north border.