Posted on 05/30/2017 8:47:22 AM PDT by Hojczyk
I guess that policy is an invitation to anyone wanting a taxpayer funded transformation, with the possibility of claiming discrimination for anything and being able to use the military and be set for life.
“And if a woman can do all that, all the power to her. Issue her an M-16 and get her to the front lines.”
I don’t agree. The presence of even a few who can do it causes many social problems in the unit and in the families of the unit. Women don’t belong in infantry units.
Why have none of these policies been changed? Why isnt there money in the new budget for the 355 ship Navy Trump promised? Why hasn’t sequester been repealed? The same Generals and Admirals who didn’t say a word as Obama tried to destroy the military are now civilians in charge of it. And still not a peep about rolling back any of his disastrous policies.
That was somewhat tongue-in-cheek!
with 20 mile marches with 80lb packs will weed out the poseurs and perfumed princes ....................... Good for early releases, and disability pensions due to alleged back juries. I have seen many cases lately, too much of a coincident that they all came from that 80lb. pack.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.