It appears to me that it is the WaPo Editorial Board's MO that is humiliation and intimidation towards the sheriff who is innocent until proved guilty in his pending case, over which the Board is obviously presuming guilt.
I have followed the events described in the above paragraph closely and the WaPo Editorial Board has failed to follow minimal journalistic standards in describing just how Sheriff Arpaio came to be involved in the "birther" investigation. He did NOT initiate it. It was brought to him by concerned citizens and was NOT funded by taxpayer money. WaPo's own Editorial Board member, Moranis, has found extensive falsehoods in Obama's biographical narrative. Sheriff Arpaio has claimed to have found forensic evidence that Obama's BC was forged that has been confirmed by a top EU crime laboratory, but WaPo has not lifted a finger to investigate relying on potentially corrupt Hawaii official representations that Obama's BC in their vault is authentic. How many US state governors are in prison for corruption? Could politicians in Hawaii have protected a forged BC in their Hawaii vault to save Obama's presidency?
How does a tent city cost 4.5 million extra to operate? Even when they tear it down, the inmates still have to be housed, fed and clothed.
They will save nothing