Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Appeals court judge wants vote on whether to reconsider travel ban ruling
The Hill ^ | February 10, 2017 | Melanie Zanona

Posted on 02/10/2017 3:57:26 PM PST by jazusamo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last
To: jazusamo

At my age I should be convinced that you shouldn’t judge a book by its cover. But the photos of the 3 individuals from the 9th circus who judged Trump’s EO, might just as easily be part of a police line-up. My Lord, what a scurvy-looking trio!


41 posted on 02/10/2017 4:34:28 PM PST by Tucker39 (In giving us The Christ, God gave us the ONE thing we desperately NEEDED; a Savior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SuperLuminal
Yes they are worried

Lou Dobbs says the Left is ready to file 47 Lawsuits vs Trump

He said 51% to 34% in Liberal to Conservative Judges if Trump appoints the vacancy that will close it to 1%. Plus the backstop of the Supreme Court

Trump needs to ignore the Court and write a New Order as planned

42 posted on 02/10/2017 4:35:17 PM PST by scooby321 (o even lower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: exit82

Trump should call out the Appeals Court’s “opinion” as Fake Law....


43 posted on 02/10/2017 4:37:09 PM PST by Paladin2 (No spellcheck. It's too much work to undo the auto wrong word substitution on mobile devices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: LouisianaJoanof Arc

He needs to issue separate EO’s for each country. Exempt green cards, and in transit visa holders. The EO should also state that he is acting based on classified intel that as CIC has determined warrants this immediate action.

Overkill, but bulletproof.


44 posted on 02/10/2017 4:37:48 PM PST by phoneman08 (qwiyrqweopigradfdzcm,.dadfjl,dz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Tucker39

I hear you and agree, it’s not only their outside but their inside too.


45 posted on 02/10/2017 4:37:51 PM PST by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: tomkat

I was going to suggest corn on the cob. Bwaaaaa-haaaa-haaa-haa-ha! Snicker-snort!


46 posted on 02/10/2017 4:39:51 PM PST by Tucker39 (In giving us The Christ, God gave us the ONE thing we desperately NEEDED; a Savior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: phoneman08

Why each country? I don’t get it. Agree with the rest.


47 posted on 02/10/2017 4:41:20 PM PST by LouisianaJoanof Arc (Proud horrible deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: jazminerose

Liberals are not capable of shame, because they have no honor.


48 posted on 02/10/2017 4:42:25 PM PST by chris37 (Donald J. Trump, Tom Brady, The Patriots... American Destiny!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Another San Francisco, CA judge? Hahahahaha, you must be joking. No way.


49 posted on 02/10/2017 4:44:22 PM PST by bgill (From the CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

DON’T TAKE THE BAIT!

Write a new E.O. that in it cancels the original E.O. so the entire 9th effort is dropped. Write the new E.O. that would render a 8-0 or 9-0 SCOTUS win based on the statute.


50 posted on 02/10/2017 4:45:49 PM PST by USCG SimTech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tomkat

Great idea.


51 posted on 02/10/2017 4:47:37 PM PST by bboop (does not suffer fools gladly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: LouisianaJoanof Arc; jazusamo
Given the idiocy and weakness of the 3 judge panel, a Supreme court decision could easily be 8-0. I suspect one 9th Ct. judge wants to save the court from further embarrassment. In no way would they want to dig a deeper hole, would they ?

Nor do I suspect they'll drop the original, but will want to rub their politicization in their faces.

Further, I think they pissed off the wrong guy. Look for a reorganization of the 9th circuit at minimum. I doubt impeachment proceedings would get very far anywhere in LaLaLand west.

52 posted on 02/10/2017 4:47:41 PM PST by chiller (One from the Right - One for the Fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bgill

I don’t think the congress has the power to split the 9th I think the SC has to order it but l’m not sure.


53 posted on 02/10/2017 4:50:12 PM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: chris37

You’re right. I learned that during the Clinton years.


54 posted on 02/10/2017 4:50:19 PM PST by jazminerose (Adorable Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: LouisianaJoanof Arc

I agree—I think it’s a trap. They may want to steal the headlines another time to say Trump has “failed”. The enemy will do anything to thwart this exec. order. They need the votes of every non-American they can come up with.


55 posted on 02/10/2017 4:50:25 PM PST by RightLady (God Bless the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

Congress can do it, and the Supreme Court has nothing to say about it.


56 posted on 02/10/2017 4:50:48 PM PST by Publius ("Who is John Galt?" by Billthedrill and Publius available at Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Sounds like one of them sees the writing on the wall, And would rather sacrifice the 3 tyrants to Save the 9th Circuit Court and Himself from being split up or Eliminated.


57 posted on 02/10/2017 4:51:43 PM PST by eyeamok (destruction of government records.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

I’m no lawyer but I think the LAST thing the lefties want is to have to argue back in Hobart’s court the original and pertinent issues that the district judge avoided discussing in his order to stay - a nation wide stay! - Pres Trump’s executive order. Hobart’s order listed zero legal reasons for the stay, only that he personally felt that the plantiffs would prevail in court.

This time AG Sessions lawyers (to include perhaps him) will be ready to rock and will, I feel, list all the reasons why Hobart’s stay is improper and perhaps even illegal. First among them is the fact that Hobart himself has no stabding to rule on matters of foreign affairs and national security.


58 posted on 02/10/2017 5:00:23 PM PST by citizen (To hold with the #MSM description used by @POTUS, I am using #OppoMedia to refer to our biased media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: blueplum
Lifetime appointments, but here's an idea.

Split the 9th into at least 2 districts and reassign each judge to the least convenient circuit, making them all move residences, (or commute their arses off ). It's likely to yield more than a few retirements.

BINGO ! I like it.

59 posted on 02/10/2017 5:01:08 PM PST by chiller (One from the Right - One for the Fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: USCG SimTech

How did the existing one not comply with 8 U.S.C. 1182(f)?
(See post 10)


60 posted on 02/10/2017 5:01:30 PM PST by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson