Of course not.
Black on white crime can’t be “hate” - they’re just getting back for slavery.
Torturing a man while cursing his race, all for the purpose of broadcasting the hatred to send a message. If that’s not a hate crime then what could possibly ever be a hate crime?
This is what Anti-Trump people do. It’s just who they are. Everyone knows.
It doesn’t matter what the reason.. they don’t need a reason to have lost their minds... and no one does this without being either crazy or angry to the core..
Punishment should be swift and LONG...
Unexpected
/s
Nope. Not even a dislike crime.
Chicago police consider hate crime charges in Facebook video of attack
http://www.chicagotribune.com/
There is a day coming, when it is discovered that two wrongs make a right. Oh the weeping and gnashing that will ensue.
This sort of thing is going to lead to a rise in vigilantism, I suspect that’s what they want. Then, it’ll be all “See, we told you so. Racist!”
Black on white violence is never considered a hate crime. Just like moslem on Christian violence is never considered a hate crime.
Hopefully one day whites will push back on this crap.
Hate only emanates from white people and conservatives.
This is why “laws” which govern thought should be self-evidently unconstitutional.
Despite the fact that they were yelling F white people, F trump, etc.
Police chief can do anatomically impossible things to himself.
The civil rights laws were made for this.
I’ve often wondered what characteristics and attributes people would use to describe what a “nigger” is. I know that the offense and hurt caused by using the nigger word is worse than anything imaginable these days. But, really, what does it mean? I’m going to say that these offenders are, in my opinion, niggers. If the actions and behavior they exhibited warrant a description no less than what they would find most offensive. So F you niggers (these 4 individuals)!
To prevent duplication, please do not alter the published headline, thx.
If I was on the jury in that *Federal* trial in SC I'd vote not guilty right down the line because of my rejection of so called "hate" crimes.However,if I was hearing the very same evidence in a state *murder* trial I'd very probably vote guilty right down the line...and very probably vote for 9 executions.Those nine people were murdered for no good reason.Execute him...nine times if possible because of what he did,not why he did it.
This needs to be prosecuted by the new Attorney General as a Federal Hate Crime.