1 posted on
11/29/2016 6:24:28 AM PST by
randita
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
To: randita
suggesting there
might have been irregularities ... Objection,.. to speculative your honor.
48 posted on
11/29/2016 6:53:49 AM PST by
SandRat
(Duty - Honor - Country! What else need s said?)
To: randita
Did she paid for the WI recount already, or swill she do this at the last possible moment to drag everything out as long as possible ‘to strengthen democracy’?
63 posted on
11/29/2016 7:11:12 AM PST by
knighthawk
(We will always remember We will always be proud We will always be prepared so we may always be free)
To: randita
By all means, dig into the Philadelphia count. Stein will be a RAT pariah by the time this is over.
74 posted on
11/29/2016 7:26:11 AM PST by
NonValueAdded
(#DeplorableMe #BitterClinger #HillNO! #MyPresident #MAGA)
To: randita
Isn't this an exercise in futility?
Doesn't a recount only recount the votes that were originally counted/gathered?
Filing suit contesting the integrity of the electronic voting machines (which I favor) is a totally separate issue and is NOT a recount.
79 posted on
11/29/2016 7:47:31 AM PST by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(Don't question faith. Don't answer lies.)
To: randita
Stein said she’s doing recounts because the polls said Hillary was going to win , D’oh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson