[BP2]

It’s actually a great thing to see ...

Idiot liberals are giving MORE money to the same people that lost the election for them.

[WayneS]

I’d like to see a recount in Virginia - with all the votes from illegal aliens in Northern Virginia discounted...

I wonder if Dr. Jill would support me in my request...

;-)

[CaptainKip]

You can recount as many states as you wish, as long as all of the counts are completed by Dec 19.

[pangaea6]

Why do this? Theory, Republicans knew Hillary would be nominee. Recruited a liberal woman to run Green in 2016 to siphon off female & liberal votes. However election turned out she would contest close states and get several million in donations for payoff from republicans. Trump may not have won without Stein in. She disliked Hillary, warned abut Hillary. Why would she want to overturn election? Stein gets a payoff, maybe uncovers vote fraud by dems. And media & people r none the wiser. Find out where donations r coming from.

[Pearls Before Swine]

Will that include VA and NH? States where Trump led until the wee hours of the morning?

[Enlightened1]

Type in Text here and Click on Source button to get HTML Source Code. 

[To Hell With Poverty]

We do NOT “want Democracy.” We have a perfectly good REPUBLIC, and we intend to keep it!

[conservative98]

[\/\/ayne]

All this sounds like a serious attempt to steal the election although many are pooh-poohing it as a nothing that will never work. Really? How do they know that?

But if Soros is spending 5 million that we know about so Stein can recount, he's probably spending 100s of millions in dark money that we don't know about for fake Clinton votes to appear and real Trump votes to disappear.

[isom35]

proof that she is a socialist/dem, she wants something, but wants others to pay for it.

[xzins]

I think she just said that she is recounting just for the sake of recounting...just because.

Surely this is unnecessary and frivolous even the way she describes it. A frivolous lawsuit is punishable. Why proceed with frivolous recounts that hold up the process on behalf of a candidate who has no hope of winning with her current 1% of the vote?/p>

[Beave Meister]

Why does a candidate who received less than 1% of thr vote get to decide that she wants a recount. Unreal.

[IamConservative]

On the surface, sounds like she netted such a good haul on the first scam that she is going to run the hustle again. The low info crowd will probably keep donating long after inauguration.

[Vendome]

[Oldeconomybuyer]

... WI, PA, & MI as the largest chance of fraud ...

Before the election these leftwing parasites laughed about vote fraud. It doesn’t exist they said. No evidence they said. Those concerned about vote fraud are kooks they said.

Then Hillary got shellacked...

[Freedom of Speech Wins]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3498988/posts

[upchuck]

From the article:

Stein is simply hoping to disrupt the electoral college process to push the 2016 election into the hands Congress while drawing the legitimacy of Trump's presidency into question.

And that, FReepers, is what this is all about. Has been from the very beginning. All this, "insuring integrity" is fluff and nonsense.

If Congress has to vote Trump into office, the RATS will claim that Trump lost the popular vote, lost the EC vote and is President ONLY because Republicans control the House and Senate.

[Freedom of Speech Wins]

Arrest Warrant out for Jill Stein: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3498773/posts

[headstamp 2]

Total Soros operation.

[daltec]

I kindof agree with some of what she suggests, with caveats:

"Want democracy? Use verifiable paper ballots, and institute mandatory, automatic and random precinct recounts."

Not sure what she means by "verifiable," but if it means that it can be verified that ballots were cast only by those legally eligible to cast them, while still preserving anonymity at the polls, then yeah I could support that.

"Want democracy? Make Election Day a national holiday, so everyone has the opportunity to vote."

Hear, hear! And then do away with "early voting." Absentee votes of course are still okay, provided you can show cause to request an absentee ballot. Otherwise, get yourself to the polls to vote, on Election Day. Yes, I know employers are already required to give you time off to vote. But to have the entire day be a Federal Holiday eliminates any question of dealing with an employer on the matter.

The rest, well, not so much.