My guess, is that the DNC and Clinton’s had a plan to steal the election, and it backfired, and not only were they unable to hack into the results, they were hacked. It would be funny that an investigation might show that they were the ones who hacked into the system.
Button line, these people are bast*rds. They had their chance, they’re done.
The presidency will never again be job for two bit politician, puppets on a string.
Trump is assembling the best of the best.
In other words, they want a chance to "discover" some previously uncounted mail in ballots that just happened to be in the trunk of some DNC operative's car, and just happen to be overwhelmingly for Clinton. Imagine that. No thanks.
...so far have only a circumstantial case...
Well, I could build an equally convincing circumstantial case that it was really Jim Morrison and Elvis, returned with the aliens that abducted them, who used alien mind-control technology to rig the election. Just as convincing, and just as real.
Their polling was such bullsh** they are still having a hard time accepting the harridan lost.
And PA is all that Trump needed: MI and WI were auxilliary.
“Weird Science: Can a mad experiment bring Hillary’s campaign back to life?”
“It’s alive! It’s alive!” FrankenHillary! Run for your lives! Run for your lives! Don’t forget your wallet or pocketbook!
The Clintons have to be heartened by news that there’s only “a circumstantial case” for this, as circumstantial cases have always worked in their favor.
Dead is dead. Final.
If they'd listened to Salena Zito of the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review rather than their pollsters, they'd have known what was about to happen.
On the day that clinton is convicted on crimes against the United States, let all those who voted for the felon in the election step forward to be recounted.
prominent computer scientists and election lawyers HAHAHAHA
Is the proposed recount going to exclude Detroit and other cities with Democrat governments? An honest recount in the cities must produce a whole lot more Trump votes and a whole lot fewer Clinton votes. How are they going to honestly recount the votes that registered as “Clinton” when “Trump” was marked?
Weasel phrases and words like "group," but only a single name is provided; 50 can be a group as well as 4. "prominent" is always in the eyes of the of the beholder and usually meaningless to everyone else.
Pure propaganda. A tiny insignificant group, spouting nonsense, and counting on the fact that 75% of the readers are both ignorant and, well, dull and; no other way to phrase it, stupid.