Landslide Approved! Trump Officially Wins Michigan (Trump: 306 Electors now)

investmentwatch ^ | November 12, 2016 | IWB

[libertarian27]

Sorry - had a touch of bad math there in my post, but the AP link is active.

[WildHighlander57]

Libertarian27,

Roadcat sent me a link on another thread, and from following it, I came across this from the NYT:

http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/michigan

has president-elect Trump winning Michigan.

306.

[billyboy15]

In 2004 after Bush defeated Kerry there was a howl (as usual) from the Left because all the exit polling had Kerry a big winner. I visited her site quite by accident following one of the links in a search page.

She claimed too be on the verge of getting information which would be definitive proof of Republican fraud and this proof would put Kerry in the White House. She went on to say the persons she was dealing with needed to be paid and she was soliciting contributions to continue and complete the investigations, etc, etc.

She would drop tantalizing bits of information to keep interest and hope from the Libs sky high and their wallets wide open.

No doubt in my mind she is about nothing but making money for herself.

[libertarian27]

NY Times Election Results

The link above is the NYT interactive page - still not updated.

The AP and NYT(I'm assuming NYT takes #'s from AP) - still haven't added up MI or NH to finalize their graphs.

I think they are holding onto news cycles to show a closer election - keep Trump from visually going over 300.

Check out the left side graphs on that link - there's one that shows county shift from 2012 using red and blue arrows across the country. You can drill down to every county in the US to see if it went more Rep/Dem this time around.

[mac_truck]

CNN: That’s it. We’ve reached peak Trump. All downhill from here. He will drop out any day now.

Lol...I can see that doofus Tapper saying something like that.

[jetson]

Someone on Free Republic predicted this.

[taildragger]

"Biggest shocker to me was Wisconsin.. it was on no one’s radar... he was never ahead, Trump even cancelled a rally the last weekend. Just amazing... so glad Johnson won as well"

Yes I had it as an outlier NYC, but think of this...

* Bernie Won WI, Trump focused on Bernie Winning States.
* Correct me if I am wrong Hillary never visited Wisconsin.
* As much as we have heartburn with them Ryan & Prebius are from WI.
* Wisconsin gets Trump IMHO. From my travels their, it is one of the few states that "makes things" think, Harley's, Mercury Marine Outboards, and Oshkosh Trucks to name 3.
* Trump has been saying we need to make things here again, well Wisconsin does and again maybe that helped fill his sails...

[New Jersey Realist]

Thanks for the reference.

[NYC-RepublicanCT]

Amazing stuff all around!!! Thanks!

[catnipman]

Nope. No call by NYT.

No check mark next to Trump’s name like ALL the other races that were decided. Nothing on that web page about 306 either.

It’ll happen, but not even the Michigan SoS is yet declaring Trump the winner of Michigan’s electoral votes:

http://heavy.com/news/2016/11/michigan-election-results-2016-update-electoral-votes-donald-trump-did-he-win-hillary-clinton/

[shove_it]

Good info, thanks ...

Otter

[samtheman]

Is “the news” (including faux news) covering this up? I don’t see it anywhere. Not even on Drudge.

[SecAmndmt]

Have you watched Hacking Democracy? It is bipartisan. Every interview I have heard from her has been bipartisan and reasonable...and she has proposed reasonable steps to “true the vote”, from what I can tell. I have heard her interviewed twice defending Trump in his vote fraud concerns.

The only people to lose if vote fraud is exposed is the political establishment.

The only person out there talking about vote fraud from the constitutionist side, from what I have read at least, is Devvy Kidd.

[WildHighlander57]

Thanks for the link.

It mentions that at the end of the month, the results will be official.

And that the SoS said they have all the votes/ballots .

[uncommonsense]

"Most states do not bother counting their absentee votes if the total absentees are less than the current vote difference"

I've heard this - I'm curious because I don't know the answer - do you (or anyone) know what's done about local elections and ballot measures?

[deport]

It might have been true at some time in the past, but now
it seems to be mere urban legend.

***************

On the state level not counting votes is one thing. But remember all the down ticket
spots have to be counted for all those county wide positions even down to the local
ward level. Otherwise how would they know who won. So I agree with your assessment.

[little jeremiah]

If you see anything about final popular votes and electors could you let me know?

[WildHighlander57]

See this one by onyx; has links to CNN, AP, etc:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3494688/posts?page=89#89

[little jeremiah]

Many thanks!