Posted on 10/31/2016 7:08:21 AM PDT by rktman
Oh, Scrambler Bob, I forgot to reference your second thought concerning Fort Hood.
” my Fort Hood reference was that none of the victims were armed to defend themselves.”
They wasn’t supposed to have one. If the entire police force and OSI had done their job, he wouldn’t have. The rules are guided by a 1993 Pentagon regulation that dictates that weapons on military bases are only allowed to be carried for official purposes like law enforcement or sentry duty, prohibiting “the carrying of non-Government owned or issued weapons or ammunition.” So he purchased an off post handgun, illegally got it on post with intent to use it, while under investigation. But no one was supposed to have a gun, especially him. He wouldn’t be authorized as a doctor outside of downrange to have one unless required for a specific reason anyway. same as mop kit. That makes him a criminal, not a carrier of a gun.
red
The Great Equalizer is what they called pistols in the West. Women could carry them under their skirts and not be afraid to be attacked.
Post #36,
2A
We The People are armed
and will Stay that way.
What are you exactly saying?
Tells me...some things....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.