Posted on 08/22/2016 10:10:20 AM PDT by MaxistheBest
Good point...I'll bet Morning Joe wanted Kellyanne Conway to come on as a guest and Trump tuned in this morning to see if they'd gotten any better.
YOU CRITICIZE ALL YOU WANT AFTER YOU WIN!!!!! WHAT Part doesn’t he get?!!!!! Ughhhh!!
I agree, need to ignore and stayed disciplined.
Trump doesn't drink and has never consumed alcohol, due to watching his older brother self-destruct and die young from drinking. Wise up, Meeka.
And so it goes. Next time Kellyanne is on any show she is going to be asked about her claim that Trump doesn’t hurl personal insults...
Only 6% of Americans trust the media so you cant lose by going after them.
https://www.rt.com/usa/340124-americans-trust-media-plummets/
Scarborough and Brzezinski are small potatoes. Trump needs to stay out of feuds with people like them. All he will do is give them a ratings boost.
Scarborough deserves this, because he used Trump for ratings during the primary, then went on the attack once the primaries were over to make MSNBC happy. .
And how ironic. Trump was gracious enough to help out Don Lemon’s failing show and appear for long interviews until Lemon began attacking him. But Lemon, as a gay, light-skinned black man, is beholden to to one group and their patronization. Middle-aged white liberals.
She didn't back down.
Oh, yeah; I remember that only too well. Isn’t that when Scarborough, Condit, and Kasich skulked out of D.C. back home to their wives, hoping and praying that nothing more would come of the problems? And nothing did, as 9/11 put their philandering issues on the back burner.
“He belted like, honestly ... like he’s had a lot to drink,” Brzezinski said.
Trump had an alcoholic brother who died before his time. But Trump is making this a personal attack.
Those that don’t like Trump’s “tone” need to man up. He is by far the best candidate we’ve had in decades.
Yep...if 9/11 hadn’t have happened, Joe would have been in serious trouble...I’m sure there is more on Joe and Mika, we just haven’t found it yet...
Your concern is noted. Thank you for your concern.
He is also, ironically, concerned with the quality of articles posted on this site.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3461844/posts?page=4#4
How ironic with your username that you would advise Trump to ignore the media. How did that work out for Sarah?
RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)
Agree.
I think there was a way for Trump to respond, but not in the way he did it.
For example, Mika referred to Trump’s speech as if he had too much to drink.
Trump could have responded with shock and dismay as to Morning Joe’s distasteful criticism. He could have reiterated that he doesn’t drink, that he’s stressed the dangers of addiction to his children, using the damage done to his brother due to alcohol abuse.
Then, go on to talk about Law and Order, how the wall will help stop the flow of drugs into the country and how a Trump administration will work on better treatment to help people beat their addictions, etc.
If Kellyanne can help Trump pinpoint openings in critics’ lowbrow statements, then craft responses that call them out while doubling down on the positive message, I think that could work better.
We’re only a couple of months out, the positive argument for PIAPS is nonexistent, the negative argument grows by the day. Keep the focus on PIAPS’ negatives.
This conduct by the MSM is intentional, attempting to get Trump off his game. Last week scared the heck out of PIAPS/MSM. If Trump can be Trump but in a more effective manner, it keeps the focus on PIAPS.
My 1 1/2 cents!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.