This poll is bogus. As you posted they sampled
26% Republican
33% Democrat
40% Independent
according to Gallup July 2016 the present mix is
28% Rep
28% Dem
42% Ind
Any poll that does not publish all the internals of the poll and the methodology of the poll is not to be believed. It is nothing but political theater designed not to inform the public but to mislead the public.
Also, 19% were not even registered. This automatically makes the poll not valid. If they have declined to register by now most will not. In fact many of those unregistered may not be able to vote legally due to alien status. However, this group will tilt strongly to Clinton. This also makes the poll totally invalid.
4 point bump for the pantsuit speech? Someone’s gotten into the funny brownies again...
There was an article about how the questions were changed after the RNC so that Hillary would get a boost. The MSM is the propaganda wing of the DNC.
For the record, I am absolutely 110% hard core supporting Trump.
I dont want to sound like a concern troll but...didnt we say this to ourselves over and over in 2012? We kept telling ourselves the polls were skewed and biased then Election Night 2012 they may have been a little biased but in the end Obama unfortunately won.
I have no doubt Trump is leading in this particular poll and it actually seems to be one of the more scientific, unbiased polls. However there are quite a number of other polls both national and state by state that show Hillary ahead. I guess my point is that Im already starting to see the same denial(s) about the polls now that I saw so much of in 2012.
Now the good news is that 1.) Trump has and will fight unlike most any other gop-e wouldve as witnessed in the most recent attempted scandal of the Muslim soldiers father. I trust Trumps instincts and game plan unlike again most gop-e candidates in years past. 2.) Unlike past years there should be enough time since the conventions were so early this year to plan/correct/adjust to the dems and their media allies. 3.) Also dont forget the Wikileaks scandal.
So Im not saying we should feel depressed but I just dont want to repeat the same mistakes from 2008 and especially 2012 when we acted believing the country wouldnt re-elect Obama. Its obvious they did and by extension would elect Hillary so we have to accept that reality and not assume the country wouldnt vote for her just because and act accordingly so that she isnt really elected.
Note to self: CBS polls are as bad as NBC polls (if not worse)
So, no measurable bounce then. Aside from the crapstats bolded above, they just brush off the 10% of voters who say their minds are not made up. This isj ust wishful thinking about the independents going entirely for Clinton, a logical impossibility.
Beware The Predictable Polling Onslaught to Paint the Potemkin Village
The Last Refuge ^ | July 28, 2016 | sundance
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3454116/posts
Thanks Timestax!
All of Clinton mediot pimps are doing what Pat Caddell describes below to create a bounce for Clinton.
This bs poll is another example of what Pat Caddel describes below:
Pat Caddell on Reuters Poll: Never I Seen a News Organization Do Something So Dishonest
Breitbart.com ^ | 8-1-2016 | JOHN HAYWARD
Posted on 8/1/2016, 11:57:37 AM by servo1969
Full Title- Pat Caddell on ‘Cooked’ Reuters Poll: ‘Never in My Life Have I Seen a News Organization Do Something So Dishonest’
On Sunday’s Breitbart News Daily with SiriusXM host Alex Marlow, political strategist Pat Caddell outlined his charge that Reuters tampered with its own daily tracking poll to manufacture a sudden surge for Hillary Clinton.
“They not only changed their formula, to put Hillary ahead. They went back and changed the results, for a week of results where Trump was ahead, and then they turned those into Hillary leads,” said Caddell. “They also erased all the former polling off the site. They didn’t tweak their procedure - they cooked it.”
“Never in my life have I seen a news organization, and a supposedly reputable poll, do something so dishonest,” Caddell continued. “What they have done is, they decided the people who said, ‘oh, I’m never for someone’ - oh, those must be Hillary votes. They used to be Trump voters.”
“They made a switch, as much as nine points, in their results from the beginning of last week, the 25th and 26th. It is, beyond doubt, the most outrageous thing,” he declared, noting that results in three- and four-way polls that include independent candidates Gary Johnson and Jill Stein were also skewed.
“This is what the media is willing to do, to try to elect her,” Caddell said. “This poll is nothing but a part of a media offensive. In the 45 years since I was a child, in top-level presidential campaigns, I have never seen the media on such a jihad, and so involved in hiding facts, and not following up. This is a crisis of democracy, what the press is now doing.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3455318/posts