Posted on 07/31/2016 12:39:29 PM PDT by GilGil
“But it’s the Republican candidate who would have banned him. And it’s Newt Gingrich who would deport him immediately. That’s his concern. And certainly no reason for him to back Trump.”
Wrong and wrong.
Trump has called for vetting before allowing legal immigration. That is not a ban. Gingrich supports banning Sharia-supporters on the basis that Sharia is incompatible with America.
Khan is not backing Trump because it would affect his income from importing Muslims and spreading Sharia. But Khan he doesn’t say this does he? He’s simply exploiting his son’s death to protect his profits. He’s deceitful, crass and selfish. Ergo, the typical Democrat.
Right and right.
Trump has called for vetting before allowing legal immigration. That is not a ban. Gingrich supports banning Sharia-supporters on the basis that Sharia is incompatible with America.
Trump has taken half a dozen different positions on this, but let's take his mildest - extreme vetting for immigrants from all countries with terrorism problems. Without knowing what criteria Trump would use it's impossible to say that Khan and his family would have been allowed in. But I think it's safe to say that very few Muslims would be allowed to immigrate under a Trump administration. And with all the posts claiming Khan is a Muslim Brotherhood supporter I highly doubt he would make the cut. So Khan père still had a point, from the Democrat stance.
Khan is not backing Trump because it would affect his income from importing Muslims and spreading Sharia.
Yeah, keep telling yourself that.
Yep, and I wasn't disappointed in DNC's Todd's views during the roundtable. The media's collective heads are spinning over this Muslim plant ant the convention. - The talk was, is this the final nail in Trump's coffin - amazing, ALL the media took this stance. Hilarious, the bias is dripping.
Just another activist liberal Hillary supporter pretending to be a newsman.
“So Khan père still had a point, from the Democrat stance.”
Khan is already in the US and a US citizen so he is not subject to immigration vetting. Yet you maintain the illogical rationale that Khan opposes Trump because what, Trump would go back in time and prevent Khan from immigrating and becoming a US citizen? So THAT’s your reasoning, not that Khan makes money off Muslim immigration and is a proponent of Sharia? Pfft, total hypocrisy.
You’re a crooked tool.
I’m done with you, troll.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.