Posted on 07/31/2016 7:40:04 AM PDT by Hojczyk
Obama won Pennsylvania by carrying the coal areas. Playing Hillary on a loop in those media markets saying she’s going to put the coal miners out of work should reverse that nicely. There are significant coal areas in Ohio as well where that could be affected.
Spot...I have only seen this actually argued in a campaign once in that way - to expand it beyond just the coal miners to demonstrate the domino effect:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITXhzjOUhC8
That’s the way you do it. I’ve been at a loss for words when other campaigns just generically say “I’ll protect coal” and don’t explain how it affects those that aren’t coal miners. That’s pretty much the way Romney did it and that was beyond irritating.
Yes, but burning coal produces CO2 unavoidably, no matter how much the coal is "scrubbed."
It's the CO2 they want to control.
Of course they don't mention that "alternative" energy solutions, such as electric cars, end up burning more coal in the re-charging, plus adding scads of more toxic stuff to the air, water and ground..
But nobody ever accused liberals of rational thinking.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.