Posted on 06/29/2016 3:49:56 PM PDT by Sybeck1
I should remind:
As far as unifying those in the party, Trump trashed the party as a whole and really insulted some state parties. He attacked their integrity and he greatly slandered at least one candidate.
IMHO, he has to take the first step back from that; that’s up to him to do.
>>Why would they unite behind Trump when it’s they who are the problem?
Ok, they’re the problem, unification is impossible; it’s not up to Trump, there’s nothing he can do.
So it’s a divided base going against a united democrat base.
If that’s your view, might as well start the blame game now.
You’re a fraud.
If you nominate someone who cannot unify the party he is the candidate of, you’ve made a huge mistake. Your chances of winning are miniscule.
I think I have more confidence in Trump’s ability than you. He’s the master of the deal, right?
Let him make deals with the conservative base.
Otherwise, your winning tack is to make deals with the libs.
You’re an illustration of how ad hominem arguments reveal a lack of cogent position.
For Trump to get the corrupt lying deceiving jackballs in the GOP to unite behind him, they’d own him. No?
Is this what your suggesting fendr?
>>>”the corrupt lying deceiving jackballs in the GOP “
There’s a unifying approach.
I’d suggest a different one.
You evaded the question. Try again.
Take your time slick.
Would they own him?
He’d be president if he could unify the party behind him.
I don’t do flame wars, so the “Slick” thing can be retired.
What do you think “unifying republicans” means? Three or four or a half dozen people?
Stop evading the question. You were taking about Trump climbing on board with the lying corrupt and getting them to unite behind him before the election. Is this not what you stated? Is this language to tough? Too much truth fendr?
Lets hear it slick.
>>>You were taking about Trump climbing on board with the lying corrupt
No... That would not be what I was talking about.
Here is what I was talking about:
It is the job of the nominee to unify the party behind him.
He doesn’t have to of course. He can choose not to. It’s not a very good strategic choice, but he can choose it.
What do ya think it would take to get the vicious corrupt to unite behind ya fendr?
Do you somehow fail to understand those in D.C. are the crowns of collusion and corruption?
>>>Lets hear it slick. Is this language to tough? Too much truth fendr?..
I’ll give you a simple choice:
Discuss the topic with respect and without personal insults, or not discuss it at all.
>>>What do ya think it would take to get the vicious corrupt to unite behind ya fendr?
Some Trump backroom deals or payoffs maybe.
But that’s not unifying the party behind Trump. For this he would need to appeal to those who didn’t support him in the primary and have various concerns about his proposals and plans. Real people.
Do ya think Trump can offer them plane rides around D.C. to get them to unite behind Trump? How about some nice cookies?
What do ya think it would take to get the vicious corrupt to unite behind ya fendr?
Do you somehow fail to understand those in D.C. are the crowns of collusion and corruption?
What I thought 20 posts ago. You want trump to sell his soul to the party.
You’re a fraud fendr.
Tell me if I’m right in your position:
In order to unify GOP voters, Trump would have to sell his soul. They’re “lying corrupt”.. etc.
So he shouldn’t do that, won’t do that.
Therefore, GOP voters won’t unify behind Trump.
Trump will have to fight against the GOP base and the Democrat base in the election.
Is that an accurate description of your argument?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.