Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Impeded Benghazi Probe, Republicans on Panel Say
Daily Signal ^ | 6/28/2016 | Sharyl Attkisson

Posted on 06/28/2016 7:52:08 AM PDT by milton23

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 last
To: Travis McGee
Remember, an Ambassador is equal in rank to a 4-star general. An ambassador possibly captured and in the hands of an AQ-affiliated jihadist group is a MAJOR crisis, much more dangerous to national security than the loss of four American lives, (as happens every time a helicopter crashes or some Afghan “ally” frags some U.S. soldiers).

That adds weight to my strong suspicion that they knew, expected and wanted Amb. Stevens to die otherwise they would have been hellbent on rescuing him.

It's just so strange that the "video" excuse was being set up to use so many hours before the attack in Benghazi occurred.

81 posted on 06/29/2016 9:45:31 AM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Son House

Excellent post! Bookmarked.

It doesn’t make sense when Panetta says he gave the orders
to send a rescue from Spain and nothing happened. Being second
only to the POTUS, when the SecDef gives a command people
move or people are demoted or court martialed. Whose heads
rolled for ignoring Panetta’s order? It’s BS, 0bungwad never
approved a CBA and Panetta is covering the coward.


82 posted on 06/29/2016 9:55:16 AM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

It eludes me why the Select Committee let this ambiguity stand, but thank you for the recognition.


83 posted on 06/29/2016 11:47:12 AM PDT by Son House (The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009; the Original Legislative Fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Yep, and I’m STILL waiting for ONE SINGLE REPORTER to glom onto CBA.


84 posted on 06/29/2016 4:48:16 PM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye; Son House

As soon as you hear any chat about “getting permission from the Libyan govt,” then

YOU KNOW THAT OBAMA DID NOT GRANT CBA.

It’s really as simple as that.

Instead, he hid, in order to not be put on the spot to either give or deny explicit CBA.

“Permission from the Libyan govt” is the big tell, the dead give-away.

If the POTUS is motivated and he says, “Here’s my cross-border authority! Tell them to kick the tires and light the fires! The next report I want to hear is jets are over Benghazi!”

THEN and ONLY THEN, it happens.

“We were trying to get permission from the Libs” means no CBA was granted, and they were still stalling and flailing around.

Imagine Eisenhower kidnapped by a Gestapo team in May 1944, and FDR just goes to bed, not knowing if he’s a POW or a KIA or what.

That’s what Obama did.


85 posted on 06/29/2016 4:52:32 PM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Still not clear when the order to ‘do all’ was given, and how does Panetta get to the 5pm meeting and it has to be made clear to ‘do everything possible’.

Had Panetta got an initial order and didn’t understand so it had to be explained again at the meeting? Let him get on another Sunday Morning talk show and not get questioned...again...(can’t remember what show but they had him right there to ask.)

Even if they had to wait for permission, is there an effort or as I read through I was reading excuse after excuse why different entities weren’t deploy-able.


86 posted on 06/29/2016 5:11:57 PM PDT by Son House (The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009; the Original Legislative Fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: timestax
 photo hillary-clinton-not-now-ambassador-benghazi-liar-101049141356_edited-1_zps3ob9r0f4.jpg

87 posted on 06/29/2016 7:39:55 PM PDT by timestax (American Media = Domestic Enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
Could very well be....

One could certainly make that conclusion.

What facts are there?

88 posted on 06/29/2016 7:44:53 PM PDT by Osage Orange (FUBAR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Son House

“Do everything you can” but WITHOUT EXPLICIT CBA still means Panetta at DOD and Hillary at DOS have to get the cross-border permission from the Lib govt.

ONLY THE POTUS CAN GRANT CBA, and direct the military to move NOW, waiting for NOBODY, with external permission from NOBODY.

The fact that Panetta at DOD or Hillary at DOS are still discussing getting permission from the Lib govt after 1900 hours means NO CBA WAS GIVEN.

This is much simpler than folks realize.

And the worst aspect of all is that Obama hid, without granting CBA, while an ambassador (= to a 4 star general in rank) who was up to his eyeballs in ultra-covert int’l arms smuggling ops was MIA, and very possibly captured alive and in the hands of Ansar-Al Saharia, AKA AQ in Libya.

“Four dead Americans” is bad, but that happens every time a helo crashes or a Afghan “ally” frags us.

Amb. Stephens possibly captured by AQ was HUGE HUGE HUGE. In crass chess terms he was a Queen, far more than 4 pawns.

And Obama punted, and hid, without granting CBA, which was the only way to effect a rapid rescue attempt.


89 posted on 06/29/2016 7:52:20 PM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee; Son House
The fact that Panetta at DOD or Hillary at DOS are still discussing getting permission from the Lib govt after 1900 hours means NO CBA WAS GIVEN.

Absolutely right! What is even more ridiculous about that phoney baloney excuse is that Libyan President Magariaf would not have hesitated an instant to give permission if anyone had actually asked him.

Libyan Leader: Embassy Attack Unrelated to Islam Video 9/26/2012

Libyan president: 'No doubt' attack 'preplanned' (Magariaf on Face the Nation) 9/16/2012

Secret email reveals top official told Libya's president that terrorists were behind Benghazi attack 5/8/2013

House panel hears account of Benghazi attack 5/8/2013

Hicks said U.S. officials knew better by then and that the remarks angered the Libyan president, who had gone on record calling it a terrorist attack. That discord prevented the FBI from reaching Benghazi for several days, Hicks said, because the Libyan government was not able to guarantee their safety.

Libyan President Mohamed Yusuf al-Magariaf was "insulted in front of his own people," Hicks said. "His credibility was reduced. His ability to lead his country was damaged."

That makes it pretty clear that Magariaf would not have been any obstacle to a rescue force. He was outraged that 0bama/Hillary/et al called it anything other than a terrorist act.

But as you say, 0bama didn't need permission to act in defense of an ambassador.

We will never hear about this or CBA in the news because they are all enemies of the people of the United States.

90 posted on 06/30/2016 9:10:46 AM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye; Travis McGee

Yep, dawned on me I was thinking too hard about this, and the order was never given, that’s why we never get clear reference of it and the actions that would have proceeded such an order.


91 posted on 06/30/2016 2:15:57 PM PDT by Son House (The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009; the Original Legislative Fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Son House
Only the POTUS had the authority to act!

0bama was notified immediately and automatically when the Benghazi consulate triggered the "Imminent Danger Notification System" alert. He did nothing.

Judge Jeanine Investigates Benghazi Gate Part 4 - 10/20/2012 video 6:53
Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer (U.S. Army ret.), former CIA Station Chief Gary Berntsen and former CIA operative Mike Baker

They confirm everything Col. Hunt said about automatic notifications to the WH and add more details.

Howie Carr interview with Col. Hunt On The Newest Libyan Revelations audio 28:37

There are three scandals here...

---------------------------------------------------------

Denial of requests for security were a dereliction of duty.

The lies and misdirection about the "video" after the attack were fraud and malfeasance under the color of authority.

The inaction during the attack was something more than that.
The failure to act during the attack is the direct equivalent of desertion IMO.

ONE man had the authority to act that night.

ONE man deserted his post!

EXCLUSIVE: CIA operators were denied request for help during Benghazi attack, sources say

0bama abandoned his post. 0bama did nothing!!!

0bama Is A Deserter!

92 posted on 06/30/2016 2:27:12 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson