Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's CVE Program Is an Outrage -- and the Republicans Are Funding It
The Rush Limbaugh Show ^ | 16 June 2016 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 06/16/2016 11:16:27 AM PDT by COBOL2Java

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 06/16/2016 11:16:27 AM PDT by COBOL2Java
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

My first thought upon seeing “CVE” was the WWII escort carriers.


2 posted on 06/16/2016 11:18:55 AM PDT by rfreedom4u (The root word of vigilante is vigilant!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java
CaVE


3 posted on 06/16/2016 11:23:19 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java
See something, say something...

...have the president shame you in front of the world!

4 posted on 06/16/2016 11:24:55 AM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

If I understand this correctly, I think I just read that Obama and the Justice Dept has banned the FBI from investigating muslims under this CVE program, that the GOP knows that, and that GOP is going to fund it anyway, if it hasn’t already.

It’s a bombshell, and it ought to get the siren treatment on Drudge.

This is news. Probably breaking news.


5 posted on 06/16/2016 11:26:15 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

The background check system is faulty.

A known crazy shouldn’t be able to buy a gun.

A wife-beater shouldn’t be able to buy a gun.

I’m pretty sure the divorce legal records would indicate he was a nut case and a wife-beater.

The FBI should have known he was nuts. His co-workers and ex-wife did.

The background check system he utilized failed and badly.

Can we have some accountability with respect to the FBI and background check system please.


6 posted on 06/16/2016 11:26:28 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

This means there will be more mass shootings and Muzlums cannot be stopped from getting firearms, period. Why are there only 5 posts?


7 posted on 06/16/2016 11:30:41 AM PDT by CincyRichieRich (Still binary in all the right ways.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin
A known crazy shouldn’t be able to buy a gun. A wife-beater shouldn’t be able to buy a gun.

With or without due process of law?

8 posted on 06/16/2016 11:32:20 AM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

I just listened to Limbaugh expound on the Bloomberg poll as if it were authoritative. It is already outdated, and today’s poll has Trump behind Clinton by only 5, which is probably within the margin of error. The Bloomberg poll is an outlier. Limbaugh acted as if it were the determinate poll.


9 posted on 06/16/2016 11:32:33 AM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

Great show today -he’s telling it like it is about bammy and Islam.


10 posted on 06/16/2016 11:36:04 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Islam mandates warfare against unbelievers and is absolutely incompatible with Western society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin

“A wife-beater shouldn’t be able to buy a gun.

I’m pretty sure the divorce legal records would indicate he was a nut case and a wife-beater.”

Half the women in America who file for divorce alleged domestic violence, just to get a better settlement. You better think real carefully about that before you demand divorce record allegations be used to strip people of constitutionally-protected rights.


11 posted on 06/16/2016 11:36:38 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

“Early reports had erroneously stated that Malik had openly expressed jihadist beliefs on social media, leading to calls for U.S. immigration officials to routinely review social media as part of background checks, which is not part of the current procedure.[43] Comey subsequently clarified that the remarks were ‘direct private message’ that were not publicly accessible and that ‘So far, in this investigation, we have found no evidence of posting on social media.’”

However:

“Comey said that the FBI’s investigation had revealed that Farook and Malik were ‘consuming poison on the Internet’ and both had become radicalized ‘before they started courting or dating each other online’”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rizwan_Farook_and_Tashfeen_Malik


12 posted on 06/16/2016 11:41:18 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

“due process”

He should have been able to appeal, but such appeals should be denied.

crazy? - no gun
wife beater? - no gun

I don’t think any Supreme Court justice ever would have ruled to the contrary.


13 posted on 06/16/2016 11:50:06 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

Rush seems to be stealing all this from Philip Haney’s new book without giving him any credit. Typical Rush.

“See something, say nothing” is the book.


14 posted on 06/16/2016 11:52:41 AM PDT by Yaelle (Make America Safe Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

“Half the women in America who file for divorce alleged domestic violence, just to get a better settlement.”

Bearing false witness is a big sin.

Such women should be wearing either orange or stripes.

Maybe divorce settlements shouldn’t be testimony dependent.


15 posted on 06/16/2016 11:53:58 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin
crazy? - no gun

If you have been adjudicated mentally incompetent in a court of law, where you have the right to a lawyer and appeal, then it is already the law that you cannot buy a firearm and will be on the NICS list.

wife beater? - no gun

If you have been convicted of a felony it is already the law that you cannot buy a firearm and will be on the NICS list.

16 posted on 06/16/2016 12:02:53 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin
He should have been able to appeal, but such appeals should be denied.

Appealed what and denied appeal on what basis?

17 posted on 06/16/2016 12:04:37 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

A whistle blower explains more here

http://mobile.wnd.com/2016/06/dhs-whistleblower-orlando-terror-linked-to-san-bernardino/#!

Janet Nepolitano used to call it man made disasters. International contingency operation didn’t stick either. Now it’s CVE


18 posted on 06/16/2016 12:09:47 PM PDT by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java
Here's the bottom line or the upshot of this: Countering Violent Extremism does not permit the FBI to factor radical beliefs when determining whether there's a criminal threat. We're not allowed to go there. We're not... Call it a variation of profiling. Not allowed.

This is elaborately stupid.

19 posted on 06/16/2016 12:14:03 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie (Apparently, most people are fine with what Obama is doing, while he ignores our problems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin
The background check system is faulty.

A known crazy shouldn’t be able to buy a gun.

A wife-beater shouldn’t be able to buy a gun.

I’m pretty sure the divorce legal records would indicate he was a nut case and a wife-beater.

What makes you think he was crazy? Instead, maybe he was just fundamentally Islamic.

20 posted on 06/16/2016 12:16:57 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie (Apparently, most people are fine with what Obama is doing, while he ignores our problems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson