1 posted on
06/14/2016 12:10:43 PM PDT by
servo1969
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
To: servo1969
Do they mean that all this time we could have just simply suspended the penumbras that eminated Roe v Wade, gay marriage, and cross-bathrooms?
Who knew?!?
-PJ
67 posted on
06/14/2016 1:41:52 PM PDT by
Political Junkie Too
(If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
To: servo1969
Let’s secretly kill commie professors and NYT’s writers. We’ll seat wooden dummies in their chairs so nobody will know that they’re secretly dead.
68 posted on
06/14/2016 1:47:15 PM PDT by
sergeantdave
( If not you, who? If not now, when?)
To: servo1969
Is the New York Times still allowing Krugman near keyboards?
72 posted on
06/14/2016 2:01:20 PM PDT by
OldNewYork
(Operation Wetback II, now with computers)
To: servo1969
nyt practicing sedition (again)?
take away their 1a rights!
74 posted on
06/14/2016 2:23:25 PM PDT by
SteveH
To: servo1969
"As of this moment all gun owners are now on Double Secret probation! No More fun of any Kind!"
77 posted on
06/14/2016 3:30:14 PM PDT by
Mat_Helm
To: servo1969
ya mean like they did in Connecticut and New York...
79 posted on
06/14/2016 4:11:47 PM PDT by
Chode
(Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -w- NO Pity for the LAZY - Luke, 22:36)
To: servo1969
Congress does not have the Authority to do that. Neither does the President nor the Supreme Court. It takes a constitutional Convention and 2/3 of the states to ratify an Amendment. That is the only way and that will not happen without a revolution along with the Cession of several of the many states.
So, until such an amendment is made, it is the law that citizens may go armed and it is guaranteed that the “GOD Given Right” shall not be infringed.
80 posted on
06/14/2016 5:20:27 PM PDT by
RAWGUY
To: servo1969
this law professor should not only resign, he should surrender his law license.
83 posted on
06/14/2016 6:55:43 PM PDT by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: servo1969
Why stop with 2nd Amendment rights? Why not 1st? Say a journalist is suspected of being a terrorist.
The AG could call up a secret court to have said journalist prevented from writing another word. Not a single drop of ink, not one electronic bit, nothing.
And there’d be no appeal.
To: servo1969
87 posted on
06/15/2016 5:16:30 AM PDT by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
